#1
|
|||
|
|||
full ring vs 6max no limit
dont know where i should post this. but whats more profitable?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: full ring vs 6max no limit
your mom
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: full ring vs 6max no limit
thanks!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: full ring vs 6max no limit
How can anyone answer that? The variables are endless. So horrible question and most likley no poker is profitable for you.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: full ring vs 6max no limit
Ill bite..If your better than everyone else at both given tables,and can adjust your game to play eithor equally well..6max
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: full ring vs 6max no limit
5thstreet beat me to it. Bad players go broke quicker at 6 max. Good players make more money there.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: full ring vs 6max no limit
Full ring if you like nits and want to wait for sets and draws to the nuts.
6-max if you enjoy playing poker. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: full ring vs 6max no limit
I did an analysis of this question once and FR came out more profitable. Remember, given the ability to play x amount of hands/hour (ones that you put money into), you can play more tables at FR than SH. And SH isn't that much more profitable per 100 hands. I used the Voluntary Statistics Survey, among other things, for the assumptions.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: full ring vs 6max no limit
Wrong. You can play more hands per hour at 6max than FR. Furthermore, it is more profitable. I have huge sample sizes at both and wish I could convert all my hours of play spent at FR over to 6max and I would be rich basically.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: full ring vs 6max no limit
I agree, I really don't see how anyone can argue otherwise. In general the people at 6 max have more gambool in them. Self Made you need to take another look at those #'s or maybe you just have a vastly different playing style.
|
|
|