![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MP is tag/station if that makes sense 24/8/3 huge showdown numbers. Button is same but never raises PF 25/0/infinity huge showdown %.
Any reason to 3-bet AK OOP against players this bad? Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.02/$0.05 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter) Hero (SB): $11.96 BB: $9.16 UTG: $4.96 MP: $2.52 CO: $11.80 BTN: $5.40 Preflop: Hero is dealt K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (6 Players) UTG folds, <font color="red">MP raises to $0.20</font>, CO folds, BTN calls $0.20, Hero calls $0.18, BB folds |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
except for not 3 betting PF, this is super-duper-doesntneeditsownthread-standard.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
raise preflop!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
3-bet PF
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
except for not 3 betting PF, this is super-duper-doesntneeditsownthread-standard. [/ QUOTE ]Fixed OP. My question is why do I 3-bet PF when c-bet on a whiff OOP isn't likely to work? Sure, I can win the pot now or one of them might shove and I would call. Their PF raise numbers are low enough that MP always has a pocket pair, AK/AQ. Obviously button can have anything, so isolating is worth considering. I don't really like c-betting and calling shove when I miss and with these stacks I don't have much choice. I will 3-bet on CO/BUTTON, or facing a raise with position. Basically, I want the argument for 3-bet > calling in this situation--not specifically, but here. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You 3Betting here for value [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hero raises $1
EOT |
![]() |
|
|