![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FT has crashed . . . again.
Given the regularity of events like these (and the ongoing FT support issues), I honestly don't see why any reasonably high-volume player plays on FT, rakeback or not. Seriously, are the games that much harder on PokerStars that it's worth putting up with this? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RB
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RB...softer tourneys IMO...
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I never signed up for rake back, is it possible to delete the current account and open a new one, and get RB?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the women
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
RB [/ QUOTE ] For lower volumes of play, yes, but rakeback is not a compelling reason if you can get to Platinum or (certainly) Supernova on PokerStars. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tourneys, that's it. If Stars tourneys werent rigged against me I would stay there
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also datamining which allows better game selection IMHO
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
the women [/ QUOTE ] lol, good one |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because when I ask them to turn off my DOOMswitch and turn on my BOOMswitch, they actually do it...
unlike stars who sends me some crap about the cards being random and fair, blah blah blah.... |
![]() |
|
|