AA vs KK vs QQ vs AKs vs JJ

malicor · #1 07-25-2007, 05:55 AM

hi,

i think it's that most people agree that the best hand is AA, followed by KK, QQ, AKs, JJ

now i would like to know is there a way to (mathematically even?) quantify how much better AA is compared to any of the other hands ?

regards, malicor

Niediam · #2 07-25-2007, 06:00 AM

Why does it matter?

But it's way better than KK (and no I don't have any math to back this up).

malicor · #3 07-25-2007, 06:03 AM

pure curiosity of mine [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] i simply like numbers

BigBadBabar · #4 07-25-2007, 06:16 AM

well in poker tracker you can see how many bb's, per average, each hand wins in the long run.

HoneyBadger · #5 07-25-2007, 06:25 AM

In my experience, if AA is 1.0 in terms of profitability -- not hands won -- then KK is about 0.6, QQ roughly 0.4, JJ about 0.35 and AKs about 0.3.

Based on that comparison, AA is 66% more profitable than KK.