Low Variance NLHE...Huh what's that? (Graph Included)

demon102 · #1 07-25-2007, 02:29 AM

last 2 posters didnt relize this is FULL RING, pretty good for the sampple size, how many tables u play?

ryanj247 · #2 07-25-2007, 02:35 AM

[ QUOTE ]
last 2 posters didnt relize that 8PTBB/100 is practically impossible in current NL100 games on sites that accept US players

[/ QUOTE ]

fyp

demon102 · #3 07-25-2007, 02:42 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
last 2 posters didnt relize that 8PTBB/100 is practically impossible in current NL100 games on sites that accept US players

[/ QUOTE ]

fyp

[/ QUOTE ]

very true

Equal · #4 07-25-2007, 03:24 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
last 2 posters didnt relize that 8PTBB/100 is practically impossible in current NL100 games on sites that accept US players

[/ QUOTE ]

fyp

[/ QUOTE ]

LOLOLOL.

Spechel EDD · #5 07-25-2007, 03:40 AM

8ptbb/100 is impossible?
are.you.serious.

kkcountry · #6 07-25-2007, 05:12 AM

[ QUOTE ]
8ptbb/100 is impossible?
are.you.serious.

[/ QUOTE ]

i've played < 4k hands of ssnl in my career and i'm fairly confident i can beat 50nl today for 8ptbb

ocdscale · #7 07-25-2007, 08:03 AM

I've played <50 hands of 600NL and beat it for > 35ptbb/100, so I'm pretty sure 8ptbb at a lower stake is sustainable.

sethypooh21 · #8 07-25-2007, 03:53 PM

[ QUOTE ]
8ptbb/100 is impossible?
are.you.serious.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I beat NL100 for >10 ptbb/100 over my first 11k+ hands (edit: 12 tabling, LDO), and I'm quite certain I'm awful at NL.

[x] limidonk proving that NL is easy?

GrandMelon · #9 07-25-2007, 04:04 PM

Also OP thats not low variance, this is low variance

My last 35k hands.

vizer02 · #10 07-25-2007, 04:28 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Also OP thats not low variance, this is low variance

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I was being sarcastic about the low variance part. If I would stop tilting so bad and quit trying to force people to fold obvious overpairs then it wouldn't be so full of variance.