#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs vs. LAG
no, you don't need to mix it up when you potstick the guy.
For example if he bets ~half his stack on the turn and u shove, there is no need to balance this. He's gunna call you cuz he's getting way too good odds and his entire stack is in there+he thought he had the best hand when he bet for value I dunno why he would think he's not still good. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs vs. LAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If villian bets turn he's calling a shove. [/ QUOTE ] OP's description is that villain is VERY active and has been calling OP's cbets then bets when OP checks to him on turn. if villain folds to 2nd barrel he doesn't have an ace. If he does he's calling you. Given his aggressive nature, why not get another bet from him then on this turn on the times when he bets without an ace? [/ QUOTE ] c/ring turn is really bad. We're pricing him in to call even if he has something like pocket 9s and we have king high. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with the point that he's probably not going to fold to 80 more into a ~450 pot. But how are we pricing him in with pocket 9's? He's getting about 5.6:1 and needs about 19:1 to call / 9's. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs vs. LAG
i like firing here again. if we check, he may just end up potting it and we have to fold; he could do this with a lot of marginal hands that he'll fold to a third barrel.
I fire for 115 (It's gotta be enough to price you in) and call a shove. I think he's folding a LOT here after his flop peel, so bet that [censored]. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs vs. LAG
[ QUOTE ]
But guys, someone who is 38/28 doesn't seem capable of folding any A. CRAI would be bad because he'd call with any A right and he might fold an A to a bet? [/ QUOTE ] But how often will villain have an ace? He's 38/28, I think his ranges weigh more towards connectors and drawing hands than aces (maybe suited ace, but not many aces) |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs vs. LAG
Depends how lightly hes peeling the flop. If hes calling with less than an A a significant amount of the time or folds a weak Ace to a turn bet a significant amount of the time then betting is obviously best. Otherwise check/fold. This turn gets checked through and decent amount of the time though.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs vs. LAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If villian bets turn he's calling a shove. [/ QUOTE ] OP's description is that villain is VERY active and has been calling OP's cbets then bets when OP checks to him on turn. if villain folds to 2nd barrel he doesn't have an ace. If he does he's calling you. Given his aggressive nature, why not get another bet from him then on this turn on the times when he bets without an ace? [/ QUOTE ] c/ring turn is really bad. We're pricing him in to call even if he has something like pocket 9s and we have king high. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with the point that he's probably not going to fold to 80 more into a ~450 pot. But how are we pricing him in with pocket 9's? He's getting about 5.6:1 and needs about 19:1 to call / 9's. [/ QUOTE ] vs our range. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs vs. LAG
I bet again if he's been floating a lot.
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs vs. LAG
[ QUOTE ]
crai is atrocious [/ QUOTE ] seriously, whose idea was this?? worst option ever stack sizes make every option kinda crappy. i guess bet/call is ok if we're getting like 4:1. i'd maybe assign our pair outs the total value of 1 out since occasionally he could semibluff shove something like 77 here. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs vs. LAG
what about c/c and shove like any scarecard river?
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs vs. LAG
[ QUOTE ]
what about c/c and shove like any scarecard river? [/ QUOTE ] meh...i think villan will still call with any ace. clubs arent really a huge part of my range given PF action. |
|
|