![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Monday we were 0-1 for -1.0 units.
Today 2 plays in mlb St Louis +127 Chicago-N: (R) ZAMBRANO, C St Louis: (R) WELLS, K Texas under 11.5 -110 Seattle: (L) FEIERABEND, R Texas: (L) RHEINECKER, J Good Luck RickJ Record to date: MLB(07 Season) Sides: 49-60 +7.28 O/U: 15-18-1 -3.55 mlb(06 season,started end of season) Sides: 17- 14 +6.83 o/u 3-8-1 -5.09 WNBA Sides: 3-1 +1.95 Total: 0-1 -1.05 ncaafb (06-07 completed) Sides 36-27-2 +9.14 o/u 11-12 -1.63 nfl(06-07 completed) Sides 26-10-1 +15.56 o/u 7-4 +2.83 nhl sides 35-36 +6.66 total 4-5 -1.10 Nba Side 78-77 -2.75 o/u 31-25 +4.98 Oct: 132 bets + 11.63 units +8.81% Nov: 105 bets + 25.19 units +24.0% Dec: 94 bets + 1.99 units +2.11% Jan: 57 bets + 6.92 units +12.14% Feb: 31 bets -6.75 units -21.77% Mar: 40 bets -9.75 units -24.37% April: 34 bets +3.42 units +10.06% May: 49 bets -3.64 units -7.43% JUne: 46 bets +14.66units +31.87% July: 33 bets -6.10 units -18.48% Total 619 Bets + 37.89units +6.12% |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm with you on the Cardinals at 10c better, and I've been eying the two games in Texas with no play yet. Tough loss last night. Good luck.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
not seeing why the love for Wells. The Cubs havent lost 3 in a row in 2 months (ESPN) and Zambrano is 5-0 with a 1.38 ERA in his last eight starts against the Cardinals dating to 2005.(ESPN) Plus Lee is back. Whats your reasoning? is it a hunch or have you got studies to back this up?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
not seeing why the love for Wells. The Cubs havent lost 3 in a row in 2 months (ESPN) and Zambrano is 5-0 with a 1.38 ERA in his last eight starts against the Cardinals dating to 2005.(ESPN) Plus Lee is back. Whats your reasoning? is it a hunch or have you got studies to back this up? [/ QUOTE ] I thought this was the best part. I'm not on stl today but I can see why riccja is, I think it's a solid play. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
not seeing why the love for Wells. The Cubs havent lost 3 in a row in 2 months (ESPN) and Zambrano is 5-0 with a 1.38 ERA in his last eight starts against the Cardinals dating to 2005.(ESPN) Plus Lee is back. Whats your reasoning? is it a hunch or have you got studies to back this up? [/ QUOTE ] I think you accidentally backed into good reasoning for betting STL. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
explain?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
explain? [/ QUOTE ] Don't hold your breath, people in this forum don't explain too much. If that's all the reasoning employed ny New001 (public perception and ESPN data, it's a pretty poor one to explain why a +130 line has value. Exactly where the value starts when ESPN release some data, at +110? +120? +140? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
The Cubs havent lost 3 in a row in 2 months [/ QUOTE ] You realize that a team losing three in a row, even if they only have a 30% change to win each game is only 34.3%. Taking any three games into isolation, like you said (and I don't doubt) ESPN said. But, what are the chances a team loses 3 in a row if they have already lost 2? If you flip a coin, what are the chances heads doesn't come up at least 1 out of 3 tries: 12.5%. But what are the chances it comes up heads after the first two weren't heads: 50%. craig |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] explain? [/ QUOTE ] Don't hold your breath, people in this forum don't explain too much. If that's all the reasoning employed ny New001 (public perception and ESPN data, it's a pretty poor one to explain why a +130 line has value. Exactly where the value starts when ESPN release some data, at +110? +120? +140? [/ QUOTE ] It's not what I used when making the bet. I calculated the line to be such that +137 had value. ESPN touting the Cubs, the Cubs being a big public team, the Cardinals being godawful, Kip Wells being godawful, all of those contribute to the line being set at +137. Hope that's explained well enough. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
they haven't lost 3 in a row in 2 months? This is completely irrelevant. We're talking about independent games here. Kip Wells throws one good game in forever and +127's +EV? I doubt it. (at least Stl isn't a horrible squad) If you're just betting trying to fade the public or whatever I don't like it. I think I'd need around +150 on this one but I'm not on it either way so gl.
|
![]() |
|
|