Pocket TT Against Overcards

[sharpie]

I think him being good is out of the question.

[Zeldark]

[ QUOTE ]
I think him being good is out of the question.

[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No read at all.

[/ QUOTE ]

[Oink]

No way that a villain who coldcalls first in preflop is betting 22-99 and Ax more often than he is calling a bet with them.

This is going nowhere. I am sorry but c/c is retarded and extremely bad poker IMO.

Edit: If villain is good then c/c is even more retarded!

[Zeldark]

Devil's Advocate is out of here. That was fun.

[FineStyle]

There's a long chapter in Theory of Poker on that subject. I will understand it fully in maybe in 10 years but it says that if villains calls more than bets you should bet and bets or bluffs more you should ckeck. First that concept probably is not relevant for micro, second you need a specific read and third in micro almost all fall in the calling category anyway.

[Zeldark]

[ QUOTE ]
There's a long chapter in Theory of Poker on that subject. I will understand it fully in maybe in 10 years but it says that if villains calls more than bets you should bet and bets or bluffs more you should ckeck. First that concept probably is not relevant for micro, second you need a specific read and third in micro almost all fall in the calling category anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]
This is false. The concept you're referring to works at all levels. If the conditions are right, you do one thing. If not, you do another. The fact that the hand is in the micros is just evidence towards whether the conditions are right or not. It is not related to whether the concept still holds water.

[Xhad]

It's actually more relevant at lower limits b/c of all the calling stations.