Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-23-2007, 02:27 PM
rubberloon rubberloon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 62
Default Re: SSL settle this suited broadway preflop stuff for me

QJs QTs always raise CO, JTs limp CO.
QJs QTs JTs always complete SB. Rubberloon's own private lunacy.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-23-2007, 05:16 PM
HoneyBadger HoneyBadger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,585
Default Re: SSL settle this suited broadway preflop stuff for me

fiw, JTs is a better hand than QTs, so it would be very strange to raise QTs, but limp JTs. I do the exact opposite, usually.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-23-2007, 05:39 PM
TheCount212 TheCount212 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: the desert
Posts: 681
Default Re: SSL settle this suited broadway preflop stuff for me

ditto.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-23-2007, 06:14 PM
rubberloon rubberloon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 62
Default Re: SSL settle this suited broadway preflop stuff for me

You're right, {Honeybadger and Count both} BUT I did say my "own private lunacy."
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-23-2007, 07:25 PM
Harv72b Harv72b is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 6,830
Default Re: SSL settle this suited broadway preflop stuff for me

Raising is the better play from a long term equity (and therefore profitability) standpoint.

Limping behind is lower variance, and places an inexperienced player in fewer thin postflop situations.

If I'm correct on those two statements (and I'm just saying that off the top of my head, I've never attempted to prove if either is mathematically correct), then I can see the logic behind limping being a standard micro play & raising being standard for small stakes. I also think it bears addressing that a limper in a microstakes game is generally much more likely to hold a hand that dominates these suited broadways than one in a small stakes (or higher) game.

Generally I tend to agree with Xhad on this one...I don't think it makes much of a difference either way. I generally raise them, FWIW, unless it's one limper & that limper is very passive & not very loose.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-23-2007, 10:22 PM
mikeca mikeca is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 277
Default Re: SSL settle this suited broadway preflop stuff for me

SSH recommends raising QJs and JTs from late position, but just calling with QTs at both their loose and tight tables.

I generally don’t raise QTs, probably because of advice in books like SSH. I probably would in a blind steal (when was the last time that happened?), a short-handed situation, or if my raises were getting too much respect.

My guess is this is a marginal situation in a loose game that doesn’t make that much difference in the long run. Biggest benefit I can see it to table image.

Not sure about tighter games with more observant opponents. Maybe QTs from late is a good play to mix it up.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-24-2007, 03:33 PM
PokrLikeItsProse PokrLikeItsProse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,751
Default Re: SSL settle this suited broadway preflop stuff for me

It depends.

What is the limping range of the players ahead of you? (I'm still trying to figure out how I want to play against people who over-limp with AA/KK/AK.)

Will the button just call with A8s if you call but three-ball it if you raise? (These players exist and annoy me.)

How will raising this hand and showing it down affect my table image? (It can be a non-negligible factor in a small-stakes game.)

I probably lean toward calling 90% of the time and occasionally raising.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-24-2007, 04:42 PM
James. James. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: McFadden for Heisman
Posts: 5,963
Default Re: SSL settle this suited broadway preflop stuff for me

[ QUOTE ]
Seriously, Micro limit posters are sick bad, just don't even read in there dude.

[/ QUOTE ]

this is a poor generalization.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-24-2007, 05:07 PM
Xhad Xhad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: .25/.50 6max - stars
Posts: 5,289
Default Re: SSL settle this suited broadway preflop stuff for me

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Seriously, Micro limit posters are sick bad, just don't even read in there dude.

[/ QUOTE ]

this is a poor generalization.

[/ QUOTE ]

As a perennial micros slummer I deliberately didn't respond to that comment. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-24-2007, 06:45 PM
Hielko Hielko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,468
Default Re: SSL settle this suited broadway preflop stuff for me

[ QUOTE ]
Seriously, Micro limit posters are sick bad, just don't even read in there dude.

[/ QUOTE ]
This comment is so wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.