#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pokerstars Auditors
I sent an email to the auditors of Pokerstars. I asked them why KK goes up against AA so many times more than is statistically valid.
In my words, their response was: Pokerstars treats everyone fairly, but that does not mean that they don’t equally try to mess with everyone. In a full ring game, what other ways could Pokerstars try to maximize their profit—besides putting AA against KK on purpose? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Auditors
in before lock
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Auditors
Ban?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Auditors
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahah
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Auditors
there is a max rake.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Auditors
Silly, everyone know it's Full Tilt that's rigged.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Auditors
I know the subject is not in the perfect forum, but I thought the answers might be different in different games; I was just interested in how PokerStars would form a strategy against full ring.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Auditors
Your ideas are intriguing me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Auditors
This guy is a G-knee-us
All who laugh will be +doomswitched |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Auditors
I think stars said the truth. I'm pretty sure every time I've been mugged by a dog on the river, I've also mugged someone else at some point when I'm a dog (though I don't do it with retarded cards like J6off against my AK on a KA6 board, and hit the magic 6 on the river - mine are more KK against AA, and I hit the K on the river)
|
|
|