|
|
#11
07-21-2007, 09:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL AQ in 3bet pot, flopped TPTK
[ QUOTE ]
or possibly c) if hes really aggro and good [/ QUOTE ] LOL? The better/more aggro he is the more likely I am to call? btw, check flop. If you think you need to bet every made hand to "disguise your bluffs" then you are bluffing way too [censored] much. I'd check a ton of hands here so checking doesn't reveal anything about my hand. 
|
|
#12
07-21-2007, 09:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL AQ in 3bet pot, flopped TPTK
well in my mind the problem w/ betting on a board like this is most opponents will almost always c/r allin or just fold and rarely call (KQ maybe?), so unless you can profitably bet/call checking seems better. here checking might be ok against predictable opponents but as you move up and start playing better/more aggro players i think you really have to bet it for metagame
|
|
#13
07-21-2007, 09:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL AQ in 3bet pot, flopped TPTK
uhhhh yes, his pf and flop range will be wider than what i stated, thus making it an easier call
|
|
#15
07-21-2007, 09:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL AQ in 3bet pot, flopped TPTK
[ QUOTE ]
well in my mind the problem w/ betting on a board like this is most opponents will almost always c/r allin or just fold and rarely call (KQ maybe?), so unless you can profitably bet/call checking seems better. here checking might be ok against predictable opponents but as you move up and start playing better/more aggro players i think you really have to bet it for metagame [/ QUOTE ] That last sentence is just plain wrong. Wrong, wrong wrong.
|
|
#16
07-21-2007, 09:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL AQ in 3bet pot, flopped TPTK
care to explain or is repeating the same word 4 times in a row all the clarification you know how to give?
to clarify i didn't mean bet it 100% of the time. i meant more often than 0%
|
|
#17
07-22-2007, 10:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL AQ in 3bet pot, flopped TPTK
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] well in my mind the problem w/ betting on a board like this is most opponents will almost always c/r allin or just fold and rarely call (KQ maybe?), so unless you can profitably bet/call checking seems better. here checking might be ok against predictable opponents but as you move up and start playing better/more aggro players i think you really have to bet it for metagame [/ QUOTE ] That last sentence is just plain wrong. Wrong, wrong wrong. [/ QUOTE ] I have tremendous respect for your "reputation" bilbo. However some of your posts lack a full explanation of your reasoning, and are quite useless at times. You are either lazy, so good that you don't feel you need to take you time to explain yourself, or lack the ability to explicitly explain NL concepts. Ike, It seems like you believe this spot is pretty style dependent. Would you play this hand the same at both 100NL and 1000NL?
|
|
#18
07-22-2007, 02:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL AQ in 3bet pot, flopped TPTK
98-31= 67 u just have 67 to call. he may pushing with many hands QJ QK AQ AK AJ, i really dont like to fold there
and a push there looks like a draw to me what do u think?
|
|
#19
07-22-2007, 02:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL AQ in 3bet pot, flopped TPTK
[ QUOTE ]
98-31= 67 u just have 67 to call. he may pushing with many hands QJ QK AQ AK AJ, i really dont like to fold there and a push there looks like a draw to me what do u think? [/ QUOTE ] Considering we have the A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]...I lean towards a fold.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
