Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-19-2007, 06:11 PM
higHstaKesOwneR higHstaKesOwneR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: from where the money grow at trees
Posts: 836
Default stack of w/ AA

Party Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $2/$4
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
Hero: $428
UTG+1: $352
CO: $362
Button: $369.31
SB: $267.40
BB: $394

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is UTG with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
<font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $14</font>, UTG+1 calls, 4 folds.

Flop: 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($34, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $24</font>, UTG+1 calls.

Turn: K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($82, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $58</font>, <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 raises to $144</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises all-in $332</font>

Villian seems to be a reguler... 250 hands 25/11

On the Board are a lot of draws possible...
I can't give villian here a handrange...
On a board like this i think he would most of the time raise the flop w/ a set
the same think for twopair
īso i thought he might be making a crazy semi-/bluff and uses the K as a scarecard [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

hm i really don't know i just shoved the turn because i wasn't able to lay AA down as the hand was played till the turn [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-19-2007, 06:32 PM
Snygaard Snygaard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 349
Default Re: stack of w/ AA

Very standard
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-19-2007, 06:41 PM
berserk berserk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,676
Default Re: stack of w/ AA

Lots of Kxss in his range i'd say. Without a read you can't fold this.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-19-2007, 06:59 PM
Praetor Praetor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,248
Default Re: stack of w/ AA

turn is fold imo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-19-2007, 07:07 PM
dd323 dd323 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,702
Default Re: stack of w/ AA

[ QUOTE ]
turn is fold imo

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I think turn is at least close to a fold. Unless he has AK and floated the flop (and you know he doesn't have AsKs), then he's probably putting you on AK (unless you have crazy meta game going on where he puts you on AK and tries to push you off it).

If he is pretty bad he could have something like KsQs, but I don't see why he would raise the turn then.

If by gambling and calling on a drawy flop with a set, it makes you stack off, this could sometimes be worth it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-19-2007, 07:33 PM
FooSH FooSH is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 187
Default Re: stack of w/ AA

K is a scare card for him, not you. He knows he can't really rep it so he probably has something better. I'd fold.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-19-2007, 07:49 PM
gobbluth77 gobbluth77 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26
Default Re: stack of w/ AA

He can't really expect you to have any part of the draws here, (you're gonna raise UTG w/67? maybe AsXs) so he could easily just smooth call the flop with a set or two pair, imo. He is trying to rep the flush draw, hoping it misses the turn, getting you to commit your stack. With a pp 66-KK he most likely raises the flop, so you can't hope he has that. If he floated you with AK on the flop then pushed here w/TPTK, say good play sir, as you will win his money later. Lay this one down and chalk it up to bad luck.

Also, I agree with FooSH, he most likely would put you on overpair or AK, and his raise says he has that beat, so I'd fold. What did he have btw? I always need to know.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-19-2007, 07:54 PM
ImsaKidd ImsaKidd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CHOO CHOO
Posts: 11,074
Default Re: stack of w/ AA

Calling it a stack off isnt results oriented at all...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-19-2007, 08:09 PM
higHstaKesOwneR higHstaKesOwneR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: from where the money grow at trees
Posts: 836
Default Re: stack of w/ AA

[ QUOTE ]
Calling it a stack off isnt results oriented at all...

[/ QUOTE ]
hm is it?
sry i am german and english isn't really a strength from me :/
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-19-2007, 08:12 PM
mertzo mertzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,387
Default Re: stack of w/ AA

The meaning of "stack of" has gone from losing your stack to maybe losing your stack
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.