Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-17-2007, 04:09 PM
QTip QTip is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: OH
Posts: 6,131
Default NL100: 77 Iso Attempt Fails - Now I Have to Play Poker

Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 9 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter)

SB: $260.65
BB: $47.95
UTG: $111.35
Hero (UTG+1): $124.25
MP1: $137.75
MP2: $15.00
MP3: $268.15
CO: $125.70
BTN: $15.50

Reads: <font color="blue">MP2 is a poor laggy player. SB seems pretty good.</font>

Preflop: Hero is dealt 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (9 Players)
UTG folds, Hero calls $1.00, MP1 folds, <font color="red">MP2 raises to $3.00</font>, 3 folds, SB calls $2.50, BB folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $15.00</font>, MP2 calls all-in for $12.00, SB calls $12.00

Flop: ($46) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (3 Players - 1 All-In)
SB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $20.00</font>, SB calls $20.00

Turn: ($86) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (3 Players - 1 All-In)
SB checks,

Well. I tried the iso play, and it didn't work. I thought $15 would do it, but perhaps it needed to be larger. No matter the amount, the play is obvious to sb.

At any rate, I got to the flop and he c/ced. With an all in player there and the action, I'm giving villain something like 88-JJ...maybe AK..idk.

I guess that would mean I have to bet the turn, right?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2007, 04:29 PM
masterdon masterdon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 169
Default Re: NL100: 77 Iso Attempt Fails - Now I Have to Play Poker

Honestly, I am shutting down after the flop. Betting again is barely +EV at best.

If he checks again on the river and it is relatively safe, you can fire out if you are feeling frisky, but I would probably check behind.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-17-2007, 04:32 PM
SABR42 SABR42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LAGing it up
Posts: 5,155
Default Re: NL100: 77 Iso Attempt Fails - Now I Have to Play Poker

Preflop is pretty terrible. Why are you isolating OOP?

I'd just check the flop.

However, as played, bluff shove the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-17-2007, 06:10 PM
mce86 mce86 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,140
Default Re: NL100: 77 Iso Attempt Fails - Now I Have to Play Poker

If there wasnt a guy all in, youd be betting for more money...if it was heads up, you should fire away and ideally 88-JJ hands that were worried about an overpair and hoping you had just AK are really conerned.
In this hand, Id give up.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-17-2007, 06:41 PM
effang effang is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,489
Default Re: NL100: 77 Iso Attempt Fails - Now I Have to Play Poker

i would bluff shove this turn too. SB must have a hand, and it is most likely TT-QQ, and less likely AA/KK (these are possible, and if your turn shove gets called that's what he has). AA/KK would usually reraise somewhere, but i have donks deep limp AA/KK with position. Your PF 3-bet really does the work for AA/KK here.

the turn K is good in some sense. he may/may not fold JJ/QQ to a shove, but also his range of KK/AA is now pretty dominant.

edit: shoving is pretty horrible too. if you had 100 bb then this would be ok, but with 125 bb this is a crappy situation.

wish you bet more on the flop, then a turn shove would work out better.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-17-2007, 06:46 PM
QTip QTip is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: OH
Posts: 6,131
Default Re: NL100: 77 Iso Attempt Fails - Now I Have to Play Poker

[ QUOTE ]
Preflop is pretty terrible. Why are you isolating OOP?

I'd just check the flop.

However, as played, bluff shove the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're going to have to help me a bit more PF Sabr.

My thoughts were this way.

I limp because I'm a limper. The short sucky lag raises semi-small. The sb comes along for a cheapish flop. It folds to me. I probably have a better hand than the sucky lag, and since the sb isn't crazy about his hand, he'll probably fold to a decent raise.

So...I guess it's an iso reraise. I'm not concerned about position, because I"m planning on being all in.

What am I missing?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-17-2007, 06:47 PM
QTip QTip is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: OH
Posts: 6,131
Default Re: NL100: 77 Iso Attempt Fails - Now I Have to Play Poker

For the record, I checked the turn.

The river came up a J, and sb checked again.

I thought about betting, but figured I was screwed at this point and checked it down.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-17-2007, 06:51 PM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re: NL100: 77 Iso Attempt Fails - Now I Have to Play Poker

I just check the flop, people don't fold overpairs.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-17-2007, 07:36 PM
QTip QTip is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: OH
Posts: 6,131
Default Re: NL100: 77 Iso Attempt Fails - Now I Have to Play Poker

Anyone else think the PF reraise is horrible?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-17-2007, 07:40 PM
coordi coordi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: running bad, playing bad
Posts: 1,622
Default Re: NL100: 77 Iso Attempt Fails - Now I Have to Play Poker

[ QUOTE ]
Anyone else think the PF reraise is horrible?

[/ QUOTE ]

Seems like your making a blatent iso with a marginal hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.