#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full tilt poker 6max NL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] what about compared to stars? [/ QUOTE ] haha yes would like to hear also (playing stars only) but on NL200 there seem few fish and they get sharked away in like minutes from these regular 30/27/6 LAGs and 22/21/4 TAGs and 16/16/3 nits... who are like everywhere... [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Hyperbole ftw? The standard stars 1/2 table has like 2 22/17/3 easily exploitable tagfish, 1 23/13/1 (lol limp callaments), 1 14/11 (DO NOT PAY THIS MAN OFF), 1 14/13 shortstacker( die shortstacker die), and then you |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full tilt poker 6max NL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] what about compared to stars? [/ QUOTE ] haha yes would like to hear also (playing stars only) but on NL200 there seem few fish and they get sharked away in like minutes from these regular 30/27/6 LAGs and 22/21/4 TAGs and 16/16/3 nits... who are like everywhere... [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Hyperbole ftw? The standard stars 1/2 table has like 2 22/17/3 easily exploitable tagfish, 1 23/13/1 (lol limp callaments), 1 14/11 (DO NOT PAY THIS MAN OFF), 1 14/13 shortstacker( die shortstacker die), and then you [/ QUOTE ] everywhere was really exaggerated... me isnt at the tables anymore because i stacked down really ALOT (and maybe its because im running bad, but what becomes more likely by now is im playing bad)... i still think stars200 is way thougher than party200? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full tilt poker 6max NL
FT is rigged FTW.
|
|
|