![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
AK off ranks 12th statistically when played heads-up against the deck. That is to say that the following hands are ahead, albeit slightly as the list proceeds, in a toss...AA, KK, QQ, JJ, TT, 99, 88, AKs, 77, AQs, AJs. [/ QUOTE ][img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
lol you lot can tell me i suck at poker... but i know my results and i am happy with them. i can make laydowns. but please prove you are older than 12 and talk about the hand.. [/ QUOTE ]So, what you're really saying is "I can dodge bullets baby!" |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jesus this thread is dumb. Grats to dmmikkel for making it so far. This hand is obv super standard and OP sucks. /thread
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
AK off ranks 12th statistically when played heads-up against the deck. That is to say that the following hands are ahead, albeit slightly as the list proceeds, in a toss...AA, KK, QQ, JJ, TT, 99, 88, AKs, 77, AQs, AJs. [/ QUOTE ]To quote BarryG quoting I forget who, "There's no sense being precise when you don't know what you're talking about." |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
or re-raise 1million to make it known that you're serious? [/ QUOTE ] This is where you need to just look him in the eye and tell him you're serious. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] AK off ranks 12th statistically when played heads-up against the deck. That is to say that the following hands are ahead, albeit slightly as the list proceeds, in a toss...AA, KK, QQ, JJ, TT, 99, 88, AKs, 77, AQs, AJs. [/ QUOTE ]To quote BarryG quoting I forget who, "There's no sense being precise when you don't know what you're talking about." [/ QUOTE ] QFT |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It's pretty rarely correct to fold AK preflop deep in anything. [/ QUOTE ] AK off ranks 12th statistically when played heads-up against the deck. That is to say that the following hands are ahead, albeit slightly as the list proceeds, in a toss...AA, KK, QQ, JJ, TT, 99, 88, AKs, 77, AQs, AJs. [/ QUOTE ] This is misleading, because 99 crushes 62o, but AK doesn't. Even though half of "the deck" is undercards, we need to throw them out of the analysis. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nope.... sorry.
if you lose with KK to AA or AA to JJ or something then you can say "ah - wasn't ym day - nothing i could do about it". but getting all in with A-K with that stack compared tot he blinds is criminal imo. the guy had him dominated. what was he hoping him to have? a-j or a-q? i doubt these would re-raise pre would/should obv fold to his shove. but even if you got called by 9-9 and lost... i still don't get how you could say "i played it well - got al my chips in on a coinflip". as i said... if his stack was short then it is totally different. but this was a wasted chance at the big one imo. so stop flaming and tell me why it is correct to get it all in with just A-K? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
omg donk you are so wrong in so many ways that it's sickening. Good players love people like you because they take all of your money.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
omg donk you are so wrong in so many ways that it's sickening. Good players love people like you because they take all of your money. [/ QUOTE ] He's asking for insight and your acting like a pompous jackass. Don't even bother posting if you can't say anything constructive. The guy is trying to advance his game you clown. |
![]() |
|
|