|
|
#11
07-13-2007, 06:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question about Bots
I think that there needs to be a much better and fairer process for bot investigations. One that involves more parties than the site and Mr. Gatorade. Also, there should be a penalty/fine for publicly calling someone a bot if they call you on it and prove they aren't. Not losing your account, but if they had to pay 2% to the person they called a bot, we'd see those bot calling sessions be gone faster than a donkey's chips.
|
|
#13
07-13-2007, 08:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: question about all this BOT Sh$t
I'm just trying to break 200 posts -- This seems like a good dumping ground for one more useless post by Chips [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Enjoy yer day
|
|
#14
07-13-2007, 09:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question about Bots
[ QUOTE ]
The truth is....a Human player will play 100000x better than some stupid program....... [/ QUOTE ] How is this a question? and how do you figure this out? Just like real players, some bots are better than others. Do agree that just running round shouting 'BOT' at anyone who beats you/don't want to talk to you is a bit dim witted though.
|
|
#16
07-13-2007, 09:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: question about all this BOT Sh$t
[ QUOTE ]
The problem is that fish see bot = super amazing player. When they think bot, they think Deep Blue, a machine that can beat any human. If the fish find out that bots really exist they aren't going to play anymore. [/ QUOTE ] I propose a 2+2 acronym to denote the often referred to group of players known as The Mythical Uninformed Fish TMUF Where are these TMUF? Do they even exist? If there ever was a god of poker then TMUF must be it because everytime I see the reference to TMUF there is always the underlying assumption that TMUF is personally responsible for the existence of online poker such that if we kill TMUF then online poker dies. Where is TMUF I want to speak with it?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
