|
|
#71
07-12-2007, 02:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sunday 100k Satellite Challenge
[ QUOTE ]
The large field ones are really not necessary with the 4-table SnG. [/ QUOTE ] I really disagree with this. The MTT's have such horrible bubble play that you can really fold in from way out. I generally try to get to 1.2K over half the average stack when the bubble bursts ( usually during the 600 1200 level so I want one extra BB) then start folding in. Tonight was the first time I ended up bubbling but that was because I made one horrible play. The MTT's are much softer the the 4 tables because the 4 tables lead to less bubble play, and thats where you can have a huge advantage on the field. My 2 cents atleast. Ken 
|
|
#72
07-12-2007, 02:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sunday 100k Satellite Challenge
13 more (36 total)
55212720 55216322 55217776 55218663 55218393 55219262 55228915 55230096 55231457 55233394 55234790 55238844 55239254
|
|
#74
07-12-2007, 08:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sunday 100k Satellite Challenge
Don't know if anyone else has mentioned it, but the max no. of people is now 17500. It should mean the sats run longer anyway.
Would like to try something like this when i get some money back on stars
|
|
#75
07-12-2007, 10:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sunday 100k Satellite Challenge
[ QUOTE ]
Can I ask why you guys are doing this challenge??? Is this for sheer profit, or just for the sake of competition. I know these things are soft, but it seems to me you can make a much better profit playing 4/180's or something?? [/ QUOTE ] The competition is just for fun. Hardly a BR builder for the winner. But in general, these tourneys are so soft, and with such low variance, I do see them as a good BR builder for a low-stakes donk. They can't be compared to $4/180's - the $2 -> 6 seats take about an hour, and run constantly. The $4/180's take 3 hours... Both fun, both soft, but these sats are quicker & lower variance. OT
|
|
#76
07-12-2007, 10:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sunday 100k Satellite Challenge
Today's update.
If I don't get on a sick heater tonight, I'm toast... ...well - looks like I'm toast anyways. OT  ps - more on the question of "why bother" - these are 10 times softer than the $2r -> $33 WSOP sats, and I played those for about $300 profit or so. & those were a) rebuys, and b) limited in how often they ran. These bad boys - the $2 -> 7 seats - are very good for me. I figure I win about 2/5 of the ones I enter, so we're talking 100% ROI. For a low limit donk, thems are good numbers.
|
|
#77
07-12-2007, 11:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sunday 100k Satellite Challenge
[ QUOTE ]
Don't know if anyone else has mentioned it, but the max no. of people is now 17500. It should mean the sats run longer anyway. Would like to try something like this when i get some money back on stars [/ QUOTE ] WOW they bumped it but like 15% Come on Stars, you know this tourney is going to be full Sat morning.....
|
|
#78
07-12-2007, 11:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sunday 100k Satellite Challenge
Well the heater wasn't...
Won 3 of 'em: 55300252 55299017 55294325 This can be a cruel game - many lost on coolers, runner-runner, lost 80/20's and the like... meh... As I said, I'm going away this weekend - I'll post a final update / ship the $$$ on Monday morning latest. OT
|
|
#79
07-12-2007, 11:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sunday 100k Satellite Challenge
Indeed it can. Have a great weekend, man.
12 more: 55309469 55308948 55305262 55303423 55301702 55302791 55299598 55297930 55287291 55286833 55282590 55276735
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
