Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-13-2007, 04:10 AM
uppner uppner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 54
Default Re: AIM musings on full ring nl (medium-low content)

lol@medium-low content, this is great stuff and very relevant to this forum.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-13-2007, 05:46 AM
LearningCurve LearningCurve is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Crossing threshold to 25NL
Posts: 1,166
Default Re: AIM musings on full ring nl (medium-low content)

Thanks, Renton. This is really good stuff and it's going straight into my Favorites!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-13-2007, 06:37 AM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: middleset ftw
Posts: 12,983
Default Re: AIM musings on full ring nl (medium-low content)

can you really only have 15VPIP when you are 11% utg?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-13-2007, 07:00 AM
BT2 BT2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,745
Default Re: AIM musings on full ring nl (medium-low content)

renton,
are you double barreling the Q44 flops both in and out of position? does this apply when you have a pocket pair yourself, or only when you have nothing? does the turn card matter at all?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-13-2007, 07:28 AM
Renton Renton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 1,717
Default Re: AIM musings on full ring nl (medium-low content)

[ QUOTE ]
can you really only have 15VPIP when you are 11% utg?

[/ QUOTE ]

thats what pt says, but i have kinda a hard time believing it myself.

I think its just because i pass on a lot of hands when facing a raise. Its just very hard to make money in that spot. I just don't take very many flops except ones where i'm the aggressor.

Like i said in another thread, my style is a compromise between being as exploitive as possible and attempting to avoid frustrating and emotionally taxing situations when multitabling. Sure, i could take all these flops and bluff raise a lot and make thin calldowns and outplay people and blah blah, but i think keeping the stamina to play 4k hand sessions is worth forgoing being a 4ptbb/100 winner as opposed to a 3.5ptbb/100 winner.

That said, the last time i 4 tabled full ring i was like 24/20 for the 1000 hands or so i played. And i made monay.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-13-2007, 07:46 AM
the_main the_main is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: holdin\' a big pair
Posts: 2,976
Default Re: AIM musings on full ring nl (medium-low content)

^
Also consider you play far fewer hands UTG so it wont contribute as much to total numbers as other positions.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-13-2007, 08:47 AM
Rocco Rocco is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bork, bork, bork...
Posts: 1,747
Default Re: AIM musings on full ring nl (medium-low content)

[ QUOTE ]

I think its just because i pass on a lot of hands when facing a raise. Its just very hard to make money in that spot. I just don't take very many flops except ones where i'm the aggressor.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? We seem to play a different game. I guess your profit mostly comes from raising and re-raising a lot and take it down with aggressive post-flop play, no? I like it when people raise before me, and I can choose from:

1) Cold-calling (if against loose full stacked opponents) with all pockets (set mining still rules against those who cannot lay down overpairs and TPTK) and suited connectors. With cold-callers also in, I may call with connectors, one-gappers etc, hoping to flop a monster and drag a massive pot.

2) Re-raising (against habitual PF raisers). Often, I take it down right there. If not, a c-bet usually does it. In general, people don't 3-bet enough pre-flop.

Also, 2 benefits from 1. Since I cold-call a fair share pre-flop, the gap between VPIP and PFR is quite big, and my re-rasies gets more respect than re-raises from a 18/13-player. Hence I can often put in a re-raise in position with ATC if I feel the raiser has a wide range, and get him to fold.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-13-2007, 09:11 AM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: middleset ftw
Posts: 12,983
Default Re: AIM musings on full ring nl (medium-low content)

[ QUOTE ]
^
Also consider you play far fewer hands UTG so it wont contribute as much to total numbers as other positions.

[/ QUOTE ]

sure but its probably something like, so playing less UTG hands should only raise VPIP

11 11 13 14 18 22 25 sb bb

I have an 11utg 25 btn and it puts me in the 18%VPIP which is why its confusing to me how his is a fair amount lower
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-13-2007, 09:18 AM
Renton Renton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 1,717
Default Re: AIM musings on full ring nl (medium-low content)

hm, idk?

maybe you defend blinds more
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-13-2007, 09:53 AM
myheadhurts myheadhurts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: AIM: same as stars SN (pm me)
Posts: 328
Default Re: AIM musings on full ring nl (medium-low content)

I'm genuinely surprised by how little Renton and Bottomset vary their VPIP by position.

I'm certainly not criticising, by the way, just I found it strange. I'll confirm my stats when I get home, but I vary a LOT more than that.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.