Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Books and Publications
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-11-2007, 05:30 PM
Nivek Nivek is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 88
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

The biggest blunder I see here is you reading that book.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-12-2007, 12:29 AM
Ray Zee Ray Zee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: montana usa
Posts: 4,803
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

al, i live in montana which is wild like alaska but much warmer. so in essence i live in a baked alaska.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-12-2007, 06:10 AM
jasepoke jasepoke is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

HoH vII p135 Yellow zone strategy " The probability of hitting a set or quads on the flop when you hold a pair is well - established: approximately one in eight. "
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-12-2007, 06:45 AM
Brocktoon Brocktoon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,187
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

[ QUOTE ]
HoH vII p135 Yellow zone strategy " The probability of hitting a set or quads on the flop when you hold a pair is well - established: approximately one in eight. "

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-12-2007, 01:20 PM
ReptileHouse ReptileHouse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,203
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

[ QUOTE ]
HoH vII p135 Yellow zone strategy " The probability of hitting a set or quads on the flop when you hold a pair is well - established: approximately one in eight. "

[/ QUOTE ]

Where's the blunder?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-12-2007, 01:47 PM
daveT daveT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: disproving SAGE
Posts: 2,458
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

NLTP:

"By playing a strictly algarithmic style of pushing all in with 77 + and AJ+, you can beat all but the toughest games."
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-12-2007, 07:16 PM
gurgeh gurgeh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 603
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Doyle Brunson said prayer cures cancer in Super/System

[/ QUOTE ]

In his case it did.

RZ

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, modern medicine is a big joke.

[/ QUOTE ]


Go research Doyles case, There was no modern medicial cure. The Doctors told him there was nothing they could do.

RZ

[/ QUOTE ]

Little did Doyle know that his guardian faun snuck into his bedroom and placed a mandrake root in a bowl of fresh milk under his bed, feeding it two drops of blood a day until the cancer disappeared. That's what really cured him, the prayer thing is just crazy talk.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-12-2007, 08:07 PM
jasepoke jasepoke is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

The probability of hitting quads on the flop when you hold a pair only 8-1 maybe i should re-think how i play small pairs
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-12-2007, 08:41 PM
CasinoR7 CasinoR7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 193
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
HoH vII p135 Yellow zone strategy " The probability of hitting a set or quads on the flop when you hold a pair is well - established: approximately one in eight. "

[/ QUOTE ]

Where's the blunder?

[/ QUOTE ]

You have 2 outs to flop a set and there are three cards on the flop. Your chances to hit a set are: 2/50+2/49+2/48, which is approximately 1 out of 8 times, which is the same as saying 1-to-7 odds. The probability to hit quads are smaller. I don't see the blunder either.

[ QUOTE ]
The probability of hitting quads on the flop when you hold a pair only 8-1 maybe i should re-think how i play small pairs

[/ QUOTE ]

How do you play them?

[ QUOTE ]
"Play Poker Like The Pros," pp. 1-394.

[/ QUOTE ]

Genius, lol.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-12-2007, 10:40 PM
sandman-54 sandman-54 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 141
Default Re: Most surprising \'blunder\' in an authoritative poker book?

[ QUOTE ]
NLTP:

"By playing a strictly algarithmic style of pushing all in with 77 + and AJ+, you can beat all but the toughest games."

[/ QUOTE ]

This looks silly when taken out of context. He's referencing a small stack strategy from Ed Miller's book Getting Started in Hold'em to emphasize the intrinsic advantage of having a small stack. What David is saying happens to be true when you buy into a deep-stacked game with a short stack. This is backed up by many hours logged by Ed Miller using this strategy himself.

Also, NLHTAP goes on to read that although this strategy has a modest expectation it is a surefire way for a pro to slash his winrate.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.