|
|
#21
07-11-2007, 04:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] So what did he have? [/ QUOTE ] He had T9. [/ QUOTE ] this is exactly the type of hand his hand looks like, i hate to sound like i'm results oriented but that was my first thought when reading OP a lot of good postflop players say that a bluff raise isn't believable here, thus i think we should be folding. i really, really hate calling here. 
|
|
#22
07-11-2007, 04:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi
[ QUOTE ]
TBH, last hands of the day against the table big stack OOP, I'd expect a random/bad villain with a reasonable stack not to bluff that often and to bet more on a bluff when it does take his fancy. [/ QUOTE ] I agree. And I also agree that a raise is not credible given the turn check -- unless you ship it, in which case both you and he will be faced with a difficult WTF moment. I fold.
|
|
#23
07-11-2007, 05:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi
I wonder how RM would have reacted to a turn bet?
|
|
#24
07-11-2007, 05:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi
[ QUOTE ]
I wonder how RM would have reacted to a turn bet? [/ QUOTE ] Probably call, maybe c/r all in? Don't imagine he folds, if that's what you're asking.
|
|
#25
07-11-2007, 05:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Small River Decision v Robert Mizrachi
[ QUOTE ]
I wonder how RM would have reacted to a turn bet? [/ QUOTE ] I would imagine he would crai
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
