#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LHE vs NLHE popularity
If you go to Canterbury now, it's 100% limit. Do you see why?
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LHE vs NLHE popularity
I thought they just changed it to allow nl? ig uess not.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LHE vs NLHE popularity
I was at Foxwoods a few weeks ago on a Friday and Saturday night, and they only had one table (#42) of the 5/10 kill going both nites. Of course YMMV.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LHE vs NLHE popularity
As a professional online 6-max limit player , in my opinion 10 handed live limit is very boring. If your running cold, some times your just sitting their folding for hours on end.
So many automatic decisions, so much waiting in between hands, so many nits who their holes in their game is glaringly obvious, yet your edge over is tiny because you have so few opportunities to exploit them.. Shorthanded limit is where it's at IMO.. In terms of fun factor for me: 6-max limit > 300BB+ NL 10-max > 300BB+ NL 6-max > 3-max limit > 200BB NL 10-max (with loose players) > Pot limit omaha > 200BB NL 6-max 10-max limit > 10 handed limit phew |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LHE vs NLHE popularity
In my experience, Caesar's Palace in Las Vegas has consistently focused more on NL than FL. When I was there last summer, I played $6/$12 and the game broke up within an hour. They had plenty of $3/$6 tables going, but that was about it.
As for the Bellagio, they had one or two $8/$16 tables, although I didn't play any of those. There were several $15/$30 games going and they were not tough at all. Can anyone tell me if this is still the case? I'm leaving for Vegas tomorrow and plan to spend most of my time playing $15/$30. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LHE vs NLHE popularity
Last time I was at the B they had one 15-30 going on. It looked ok but nothing like the 2-5 tables.
|
|
|