Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-04-2007, 01:36 AM
TheFishhh TheFishhh is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 25
Default Re: Theory: An ICM Tutorial Chat. (Long)

Homework #1: 22s vs. 22s, 33s vs. 33s, etc. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I will play around with actual hands later.

Homework #2: EV (Fold): .302. EV (Push & win): .364. EV (Push & lose): .243; thus EV (Push): .3035, because .5 * .364 + .5 * .243 = .3035. Resulting in a difference of .0015. & since we're living in a hypothetical world, it's +EV, & therefore we're pushing.

I hope I passed. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-04-2007, 09:57 AM
BradleyT BradleyT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vote Ron Paul 08
Posts: 7,087
Default Re: Theory: An ICM Tutorial Chat. (Long)

In the scenario given (3000,1000,1000,5000 and we're pushing into a 1000) IMO anything 0 or above is a no-brain push. You can't go bust, when you lose there's still another stack half the size of yours and one equal to yours, and winning gets you ITM with 20BB vs chipleaders 25BB. And if big stack has been stealing my blinds because of the bubble it makes a +0 decision that much easier.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-04-2007, 10:56 PM
mildeng mildeng is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 90
Default Re: Theory: An ICM Tutorial Chat. (Long)

I'm still learning this too, in the beginning of the tourney, everyone's equity = .1. When Player 10 lost to player one, how does the math go for the new ICM numbers?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-05-2007, 05:31 AM
Insty Insty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: supernit with no sense of humor.
Posts: 908
Default Re: Theory: An ICM Tutorial Chat. (Long)

[ QUOTE ]
I'm still learning this too, in the beginning of the tourney, everyone's equity = .1. When Player 10 lost to player one, how does the math go for the new ICM numbers?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure I understand the question. Try typing the numbers into the ICM calculator that is linked and having a look.

Hint: They will always add up to 1. (100%)

If you want to know how to actually do the ICM calculations, come to IRC and ask so I can get another chat to post [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-05-2007, 06:42 AM
holy32 holy32 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 539
Default Re: Theory: An ICM Tutorial Chat. (Long)

very nice post.

Maybe add this to the FAQ as the quick ICM intro ?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-05-2007, 07:57 AM
montagu montagu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 65
Default Re: Theory: An ICM Tutorial Chat. (Long)

Insty, would you be so kind as to also post the lesson on ranges, once you have done that one. I have found this post massively informative, thanks alot.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-07-2007, 03:35 PM
techrush techrush is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 38
Default Re: Theory: An ICM Tutorial Chat. (Long)

bump because this information is invaluable.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-05-2007, 08:30 AM
RexWoo RexWoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 16s & 27s
Posts: 3,419
Default Re: Theory: An ICM Tutorial Chat. (Long)

[ QUOTE ]
very nice post.

Surely add this to the FAQ as the quick ICM intro ?

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-05-2007, 08:07 AM
TheFishhh TheFishhh is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 25
Default Re: Theory: An ICM Tutorial Chat. (Long)

[ QUOTE ]
I'm still learning this too, in the beginning of the tourney, everyone's equity = .1. When Player 10 lost to player one, how does the math go for the new ICM numbers?

[/ QUOTE ]

Everyone's equity, excluding P#1, increased by 0.002. P#1's equity, doubling up through P#10, is increased by 0.084. I believe the significance of this comes in when you estimate the equity behind doubling up 6-10 handed, as opposed to 2-5 handed. For example, say on the bubble (4-handed, obv.), everyone miraculously had 3,750. Now, everyone's equity as it stands is .250, or $25. Now, if P#2 were to push all-in (as the SB) against P#1 (the BB) & get called, depending on the situation (yada, yada, yada), if P#2 were to win, his equity of the pot will have almost doubled & he'd be sittin' pretty after the bubble (with an equity of .348, or $34.80c). Now, compare P#2's increase in equity (on the bubble) to P#1's increase in equity (still 10-handed) & you get a feel for why doubling up on the bubble is of more significance in the opening orbits.

I think..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-05-2007, 08:39 AM
simonpoker simonpoker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 319
Default Re: Theory: An ICM Tutorial Chat. (Long)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm still learning this too, in the beginning of the tourney, everyone's equity = .1. When Player 10 lost to player one, how does the math go for the new ICM numbers?

[/ QUOTE ]

By doubling up early on your equity almost doubles(Increases more than 80%) but while you double up on bubble it increases by ~55%.The reasons why you shouldn't take risks early on are others not that doubeling up isn't worth any.

Everyone's equity, excluding P#1, increased by 0.002. P#1's equity, doubling up through P#10, is increased by 0.084. I believe the significance of this comes in when you estimate the equity behind doubling up 6-10 handed, as opposed to 2-5 handed. For example, say on the bubble (4-handed, obv.), everyone miraculously had 3,750. Now, everyone's equity as it stands is .250, or $25. Now, if P#2 were to push all-in (as the SB) against P#1 (the BB) & get called, depending on the situation (yada, yada, yada), if P#2 were to win, his equity of the pot will have almost doubled & he'd be sittin' pretty after the bubble (with an equity of .348, or $34.80c). Now, compare P#2's increase in equity (on the bubble) to P#1's increase in equity (still 10-handed) & you get a feel for why doubling up on the bubble is of more significance in the opening orbits.

I think..

[/ QUOTE ]

By doubling up early on your equity almost doubles(Increases more than 80%) but while you double up on bubble it increases by ~55%.The reasons why you shouldn't take risks early on are others not that doubeling up isn't worth any.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.