#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 Table on Stars
Hah I would have folded to that turn 4-bet if I were paying any kind of attention
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 Table on Stars
Table looks pretty dead now
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 Table on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
Hah I would have folded to that turn 4-bet if I were paying any kind of attention [/ QUOTE ] With how I was playing, that would have been an incredibly stupid fold. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 Table on Stars
LOL you mean you don't always run 40/13/1.1 at FR? And you don't always have a win rate of +40BB/100?
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 Table on Stars
Well, the latter is pretty constant.
I'm usually more aggressive, though. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 Table on Stars
OK If you are usually more aggressive I guess +40BB/100 is sustainable.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 Table on Stars
I didn't keep track of how many hands it was but I ended with exactly what I started with. Not very common occurence that one. It may just be selective memory, but Bravos again destroys me.
|
|
|