|
|
|
|
#1
06-29-2007, 01:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
And putting ridic portions of your stack in pf with [censored] like 45o etc. cannot be +EV no matter how good you are.
|
|
#2
06-29-2007, 02:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
he was playing more like 20/14, your sample must have been severely distorted. anyway, i don't mind your line but i'd rather just bet the flop.
|
|
#3
06-29-2007, 03:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
[ QUOTE ]
he was playing more like 20/14, your sample must have been severely distorted. anyway, i don't mind your line but i'd rather just bet the flop. [/ QUOTE ] I said my sample when posting was 91 hands. How are you claiming to know what he was playing like since you weren't at the table? Or you mean you have him at 20/14?
|
|
#4
06-29-2007, 02:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
[ QUOTE ]
And putting ridic portions of your stack in pf with [censored] like 45o etc. cannot be +EV no matter how good you are. [/ QUOTE ] BUT HAY, it works for twin_caracas AMIRITE?
|
|
#5
06-29-2007, 02:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] And putting ridic portions of your stack in pf with [censored] like 45o etc. cannot be +EV no matter how good you are. [/ QUOTE ] BUT HAY, it works for twin_caracas AMIRITE? [/ QUOTE ] I 4GOT DAT!!1
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
