|
|
#21
06-28-2007, 10:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Buy-ins for 25nl
Oober...I think he just meant that 3 BI downswings are ultra-standard even if you play super-nitty. Therefore nobody should ever play so shallow with their bankroll that they would even notice a 3 BI downswing.
|
|
#22
06-28-2007, 10:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Buy-ins for 25nl
[ QUOTE ]
Oober...I think he just meant that 3 BI downswings are ultra-standard even if you play super-nitty. Therefore nobody should ever play so shallow with their bankroll that they would even notice a 3 BI downswing. [/ QUOTE ] Understandable.
|
|
#23
06-28-2007, 11:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Buy-ins for 25nl
[ QUOTE ]
This was over about 6k hands. Yeah rake at NL10 is crazy. Full tilt is brutal, I wonder if the perception of more beats is because you actually see the action unfolding, "Ok I got a set, what you got? hmm diamonds, " <crosses fingers>, "no diamonds, no diamonds......ah [censored]." [/ QUOTE ] Like others have hinted would be to drop down in the number of tables you play that should increase how much you can focus on each individually and that seems to make a big difference - compared to 8 tabling on autopilot [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] and hence help you stop the bleeding Otherwise I am not sure if there is much you can do other than moving back to stars?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
