|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Is it correct to respond via AIM to a turbospam? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
2 | 22.22% |
| No |
  
|
5 | 55.56% |
| [null]/No opinion |
  
|
2 | 22.22% |
| Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
06-27-2007, 06:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL50] 5-Handed. KK vs Big stack!
[ QUOTE ]
With no reads this is a shove. [/ QUOTE ] i completely disagree with this. no reads and he 4-bets you after you make a huge 3-bet AND you are both 300bb's behind. I'm going to assume he's not an idiot here and fold. 
|
|
#32
06-27-2007, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [NL50] 5-Handed. KK vs Big stack!
I definatly don't think shoving here is good, unleass u have a read that he's a complete donk - I think he's even folding KK pre to a shove.
I'm probably just folding here.....simply way to much variance 300bb deep
|
|
#33
06-28-2007, 07:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [NL50] 5-Handed. KK vs Big stack!
Do nobody give him a chance to be on a semi-bluff with JJ/TT?
My bet of 20$ has show him that I won't see a flop and prefere to take the 7$ right now! I think he could 4-bet just because he think I'm weak and he could take 20$ easily! I know that in his case, I would do the same, knowing that 60$ didn't commit me to the pot!
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
