LC: We're playing SNGs-are we idiots?

[Kevin8423]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

My PT stats (sample size 4000+):
Pre Frist ITM 40.69% ROI 23.31
Post Frist ITM 38.55% ROI 25.19


[/ QUOTE ]

this is very false.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[costanza_g]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

My PT stats (sample size 4000+):
Pre Frist ITM 40.69% ROI 23.31
Post Frist ITM 38.55% ROI 25.19


[/ QUOTE ]

this is very dependant on buyin.

[/ QUOTE ]

[Kevin8423]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

My PT stats (sample size 4000+):
Pre Frist ITM 40.69% ROI 23.31
Post Frist ITM 38.55% ROI 25.19


[/ QUOTE ]

this is very dependant on buyin.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he is saying its Pokerstars $55s.

[microbet]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

My PT stats (sample size 4000+):
Pre Frist ITM 40.69% ROI 23.31
Post Frist ITM 38.55% ROI 25.19


[/ QUOTE ]

this is very dependant on buyin.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he is saying its Pokerstars $55s.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he is saying it's Party $55s

[Kevin8423]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

My PT stats (sample size 4000+):
Pre Frist ITM 40.69% ROI 23.31
Post Frist ITM 38.55% ROI 25.19


[/ QUOTE ]

this is very dependant on buyin.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he is saying its Pokerstars $55s.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he is saying it's Party $55s

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh yeah you are right.. though I don't see how this can be accurate regardless. Can Party really be so much easier? 25% pretty much isn't even possible at $16s on Stars.

[HoldingFolding]

I posted similar stats about a year and a half ago & got similar responses - not sure why I bother. Yes, it's Party $55s.

(Not sure if it would be statistically valid) But I'm thinking the slight change in the ITM/ROI might be because the new influx of Europeans have less idea about playing the bubble.

The only period I played Stars I was just about over break even & gave up.

Incidentally, I could also post my PS MTT ROI which is impressively negative [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[PokahGirl]

[ QUOTE ]
I posted similar stats about a year and a half ago & got similar responses - not sure why I bother. Yes, it's Party $55s.

(Not sure if it would be statistically valid) But I'm thinking the slight change in the ITM/ROI might be because the new influx of Europeans have less idea about playing the bubble.

The only period I played Stars I was just about over break even & gave up.

Incidentally, I could also post my PS MTT ROI which is impressively negative [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

what is your screen name on party?? because I multitable the 55s, 109s, and 215s and my ROI is no where NEAR that. Curious because I havent noticed anyone doing that well?

[ManChild]

[ QUOTE ]
the new influx of Europeans have less idea about playing the bubble.

[/ QUOTE ]

where are they coming from? what is causing the influx?

[RexWoo]

[ QUOTE ]
where are they coming from? what is causing the influx?

[/ QUOTE ]

Massive advertising + Poker being on TV only since 2-3 years.

In France / Germany it's quite big nowadays, it's even mentionned in mainstream medias regularly which was NEVER the case 1 or 2 years ago.

[Stevens65]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
where are they coming from? what is causing the influx?

[/ QUOTE ]

Massive advertising + Poker being on TV only since 2-3 years.

In France / Germany it's quite big nowadays, it's even mentionned in mainstream medias regularly which was NEVER the case 1 or 2 years ago.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep, the poker population in Germany is growing rapidly. You have many poker broadcasts in prime time sponsered by Pokerstars and Party Poker. You watch Phil Ivey and Johnny Chan making great moves and Katja Thater explains their reasoning. In their commercials Stars and Party always point out their school character where everyone can learn poker just by playing with play money. In some special broadcasts you can see some VIPs (TV, Sports, Society) playing poker and try to behave like the great players.