|
|
#1
06-25-2007, 06:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
nl100 nutflush vs TaG
villain is a solid TaG, no specific history
The turn was a missed crai. effective stacks are 86BB. I did not repop preflop because I wanted to keep the limper in who is a total airhead. dellik: Post SB $0.50 0HaiaN: Post BB $1.00 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to 0HaiaN [Qs As] jack76: Fold GreenBlaze7: Call $1.00 Rennee: Raise $5.00 (BTN) dellik: Fold 0HaiaN: Call $4.00 (BB) GreenBlaze7: Fold *** FLOP *** [3d 3s 4s] 0HaiaN: Check Rennee: Bet $5.00 0HaiaN: Raise $14.00 Rennee: Call $9.00 *** TURN *** [9s] 0HaiaN: Check Rennee: Check *** RIVER *** [Kh] 0HaiaN: Bet $23.00 Rennee: Allin $68.05 0HaiaN: Call $45.05 
|
|
#3
06-25-2007, 06:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: nl100 nutflush vs TaG
[ QUOTE ]
-c/r bigger on the flop -lead the turn -river is easy bet/call [/ QUOTE ] c/r size is ok it does not change his range for calling/reraising at all IMO (maybe he'll 3betbluff me a little more often but that would be perfect for me obv.), even minraising could be taken into consideration. If I lead the turn he will not call/raise unless he has an overpair with a spade in it or better. If he has a flush or a FH we'll get it in anyways.
|
|
#4
06-25-2007, 06:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: nl100 nutflush vs TaG
3bet preflop. I don't like your reasoning for just calling.
I like a bet/3bet on the flop vs some opponents if image is right. Against others I'm happy to just c/c here. I don't like a c/r much at all though. You aren't folding out many better hands, and you're going to end up in a bloated pot oop on a blank turn.
|
|
#5
06-25-2007, 06:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: nl100 nutflush vs TaG
PF is a mistake imo. Keeping the limper in can hardly justify playing a potentially big pot oop w/o initiative. Plus: he might even elect to call your 3bet or fold to the raise anyway (as he did).
I don't mind the rest of the hand at all. I don't think a bigger c/r will accomplish much and if villain is the kind of player to 3bet paired flops with air it's a good thing to give him the idea he can punish you for making ridiculous c/r's. Leading the turn wouldn't be too bad if villain is capable of exercising a stack-a-donk on a dangerous board against you - i.e. he shouldn't give your bets too much credit. As played river is standard.
|
|
#6
06-26-2007, 08:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: nl100 nutflush vs TaG
anyone else like a flat call on a paired flop with 2 opponents?
|
|
#7
06-26-2007, 08:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: nl100 nutflush vs TaG
[ QUOTE ]
anyone else like a flat call on a paired flop with 2 opponents? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah this is fine. Vs most idiots you don't really have much FE except over hands you want to keep in - i.e. weaker flush draws, straight draws etc. Pf is fine.
|
|
#8
06-26-2007, 08:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: nl100 nutflush vs TaG
[ QUOTE ]
anyone else like a flat call on a paired flop with 2 opponents? [/ QUOTE ]there is only one?! sry if its only hypothetical [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
