#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL - POOOOOSH!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] AJ - You like them nice 'n thick, huh? [/ QUOTE ] Vida Guerra. Comprende amigo? [/ QUOTE ] Si. Thicky thick girl. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL - POOOOOSH!
Incidentally, I'd be happy to call this preflop. Is that just me? You already have three players involved and could easily encourage more in with the call.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL - POOOOOSH!
[ QUOTE ]
i think u shouldve raised way less on flop and gave some1 a chance to make a mistake [/ QUOTE ] I agree with this checkraise say a pot-sized amount. AJ makes a good point about how transparent your hand is with your play. I would lead 40-45 into this pot and hoping to get re-raised on the flop. Move all-in once you have a donk or two more committed to the pot. Leading in these spots from a value standpoint is almost always better than trying to get tricky on the flop. I dont like your play on the flop. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL - POOOOOSH!
raise pot.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL - POOOOOSH!
What about preflop? At the moment when hero calls, there are 3 guaranteed opponents and one very possible opponent. If hero calls, it could entice further calls.
Is this a clear call or a clear fold? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL - POOOOOSH!
[ QUOTE ]
lead pot. [/ QUOTE ] |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL - POOOOOSH!
You bet way less, one of the players call, the other calls, the board pairs or a J spikes, you have ~150 left in a pot over 200, you are OOP, what now? Also, isn't a raise of less even more transparent than a push? Leading the flop here will get JJ-AA, a set, or even two pair to make a push. It will look like a probe bet on a dry board.
A' |
|
|