#92
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What top pro has the least gamble in them?
[ QUOTE ]
ted forrest [/ QUOTE ] Are you kidding? He's insane. Once ran 100 miles without training to win a bet. Almost killed himself. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What top pro has the least gamble in them?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] ted forrest [/ QUOTE ] Are you kidding? . [/ QUOTE ] yeah |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What top pro has the least gamble in them?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] "Forrest's bankroll consisted of exactly one rack of 5k chips" 500k? [/ QUOTE ] a.k.a. 25 bets [/ QUOTE ] This is correct. He was up like $2M in the previous 4 months, but spent/gambled/invested it all. It's in this book. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What top pro has the least gamble in them?
durrr
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What top pro has the least gamble in them?
Jman, Phil Hellmuth called him a nit.
|
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What top pro has the least gamble in them?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Ferguson is a nit [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ]Didn't Ferguson quote Joey Knish as the true hero in Rounders? That should say it all about who's def. not a gambler |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What top pro has the least gamble in them?
anyone who is saying ted forrest should never be allowed to contribute to a NVG thread ever again. he is one of the sickest prop bettors and pit gamblers of all time. he has lost over a million in one day playing craps on more than one occasion.
and as far as howard lederer goes, he is also an infamous prop bettor, and he used to run a huge sports betting operation in which he and steve zolotow were betting several million every weekend. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What top pro has the least gamble in them?
[ QUOTE ]
michael mizrachi? "the grinder" does he have gamble in him? [/ QUOTE ] Grinder and all the Mizrachis cannot resist the siren song of the baccarat tables. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What top pro has the least gamble in them?
I think Chris Ferguson is a front runner here. I like Ferguson and admire his thinking on poker but it's extremely analytical/logical/math based. IMHO, he would see table games/prop bets/etc as -EV and thus wouldn't be interested. No gambool.
|
|
|