|
View Poll Results: Would you rather | |||
Marry for love? | 109 | 85.83% | |
Marry for money? | 18 | 14.17% | |
Voters: 127. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cost of exposed hole cards
As stands, do you think FT loses much business to Stars because of their current policy of exposing mucked hands at showdown to non-playing observers (i.e. or for that matter allowing datamining)? Would that change significantly if they started revealing mucked hands to observers in pre-showdown folds as well?
Granted this is not an insigificant difference, revealing complete preflop hand ranges, bluffs and big folds obvious adds a wealth to the value of datamining. I just wonder how much business a site would lose if they implemented this policy - even if they did so on a 24 hour delay? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cost of exposed hole cards
[ QUOTE ]
As stands, do you think FT loses much business to Stars because of their current policy of exposing mucked hands at showdown to non-playing observers (i.e. or for that matter allowing datamining)? [/ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure this is wrong. I think only players in the game can see the mucked hands, that's the way it's always been for me I believe. EDIT: Just tried it. As an observer, you can only see cards that were shown at showdown -- not mucked ones. |
|
|