100/200 150bb deep - play along

[TheWorstPlayer]

no, flop went chkchkchk. turn went bet/call/fold. i agree that turn should be checked. i would c/c or c/f the river. def don't think you're ahead 50% of the time you're called on the river (although of course I agree you're ahead more than 50% of the time, which is irrelevant).

[KRANTZ]

what about river c/r?

[TheWorstPlayer]

for value? too thin. for bluff? insane.

[jsnipes28]

[ QUOTE ]
what about river c/r?

[/ QUOTE ]

i just don't think he's going to betting <Ax if you check to him outside of busted draws so there's no point in c/r those. If somehow you knew that he would bet 2nd pair then I think a river c/r would be pretty sick.

[KRANTZ]

river c/r would definitely be a bluff not for value

[jsnipes28]

[ QUOTE ]
river c/r would definitely be a bluff not for value

[/ QUOTE ]

wtf are you trying to bluff and how could you ever assume he's only betting hand that beat you if you check given the action?

[TheWorstPlayer]

[ QUOTE ]
river c/r would definitely be a bluff not for value

[/ QUOTE ]
i'm gonna stick with 'insane'. i think c/c is a LOT better than c/r.

[KRANTZ]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
river c/r would definitely be a bluff not for value

[/ QUOTE ]
i'm gonna stick with 'insane'. i think c/c is a LOT better than c/r.

[/ QUOTE ]

what about c/f? where do you rate that?

couldn't i play a set exactly the same way with a river c/r?

i don't know if he will only bet hands that beat me. i hold the 3h so i could also have 3h5h. will aba make a somewhat obvious bluff with a missed draw? all relevant.

if he is betting for value, he probably has AT-AQ. so how is a c/r insane?

[Bill King]

[ QUOTE ]
river c/r would definitely be a bluff not for value

[/ QUOTE ]

this is why i only c/r a [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] river, as far as non hearts i like betting and folding.. checking and calling is pretty weak unless its a bluff catcher