LC: ptbb/100 vs bb/100

[the_main]

I know your hourly rate is most important, but when measuring your winrate, which stat is more relevant?

As far as I know ptbb/100 is a limit measurment, and is essentially a 'big bet' ($8 at 2/4NL).

Isn't bb/100 (the big blind amount) a better measure for NL because there really is no 'big bet'?

FWIW, this is easily changed in pokertrackers preferences:

[fitnessfreak]

how is this [censored] in any way relevant to this forum. measure it however you want, it makes no difference.

u should rly think before you start a thread like this in future. ur just cluttering the forum with a totally useless post.

[FionnMac]

Even if bb/100 is more relavent to NL, ptbb/100 is a system we are all used to, so it is ludicrous to think of changing it.

[SpecT]

yeh i hate ppl the use bb/100, and ur like.. OMG 14BB/100 OVER 100K HANDS SO SICK

sigh

[DerekJCEX]

[ QUOTE ]
how is this [censored] in any way relevant to this forum. measure it however you want, it makes no difference.

u should rly think before you start a thread like this in future. ur just cluttering the forum with a totally useless post.

[/ QUOTE ]

tilt?

[TheMetetron]

bb/100 is obviously the only one that makes any sense for No Limit. It just took PokerTracker so damn long to make that option available that now PTBB/100 is standard.

[aislephive]

[ QUOTE ]
bb/100 is obviously the only one that makes any sense for No Limit. It just took PokerTracker so damn long to make that option available that now PTBB/100 is standard.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pretty brilliant marketing scheme by the guys who made PT actually.

[Jinx]

when people talk about xx/100 i assume they mean ptbb/100

[silenced]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
bb/100 is obviously the only one that makes any sense for No Limit. It just took PokerTracker so damn long to make that option available that now PTBB/100 is standard.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pretty brilliant marketing scheme by the guys who made PT actually.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol true dat