2.25 to 6.50s completely confused.

[johnnyknish]

ahh ok so if i swithced over to a regular STT it would probably decrease, the varience even slightly

[Th3R3dDr4g0n]

How many SNGs do you have for that 60% ROI?

[johnnyknish]

probably like 70 or 80

[Th3R3dDr4g0n]

that's insanely good

[DeuceSeven]

I screw around on the 2.25s when I'm drinking or playing for fun and find people play a lot looser overall with raising and calling. You can't really base much on your small sample size at the 2.25s, you could still be a losing player, break even player, or a winning player. It's not uncommon to run bad/good, post some hands your not sure you played well.

[popimp3333]

Good ol variance rearing its ugly head. Just try not to let other ppls bad calls sway your future decisions. Play it right everytime and overtime u will win.

[johnnyknish]

thank you i wish i could carry it over to the sixes haha ...its basically because i have no fear to make moves once the blinds get big and i just sit around because people throw there chips away in the beggining

[johnnyknish]

i also played on pokerstars for awhile. over 200 games had a $400 profit so we can say ive played about 300 games, and i realize its not a big enough sample size. yet i try to adhear to the ideas of basic STT strategy. and i just started with sitngo wiz

[hoyasnaxa]

[ QUOTE ]
probably like 70 or 80

[/ QUOTE ]

this is a very small sample size, just read the FAQ.

[pragmatist]

TO be able to make a helpful response you will need to post some hand examples. I am sure you are not playing perfectly.
So to claim that variance is your problem is a total cop out. Most people think they lose because of variance and are wrong.