Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-14-2007, 12:20 PM
Warren Harding Warren Harding is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Madison, WI, USA
Posts: 1,130
Default Re: NL 25 87-line check


I disagree with a lot of responses. A raise with that many players on that flop is ominous. Note that we have next to zero hands on villain, and especially lack any evidence that s/he plays draws like this. Most of the time villain has an 8 (nearly always with a better kicker) or a king. Since we want to lose the least to another 8 and keep villain in the hand with a king, hero should play more passively. I suggest calling the flop raise and check-calling most turns. On that particular turn I would check raise.

Preflop, flop, I play it the same.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-14-2007, 10:09 PM
phydaux phydaux is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pre-Flop Razor
Posts: 2,016
Default Re: NL 25 87-line check

grunch

With the flop raise, I'm putting MP2 on Kx. If he had KK or AK he would have raised after two players had already limped, and the odds of him having the case 8 with a better kicker are low.

So here a re-raise of slightly more than the pot is fine, and calling his all-in is fine.

I'm guessing he hit his two-outer for full over full? Oh well. Most likely, you got your money in when you had the best hand and were unlikely to be outdrawn. That's the best you can hope for.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-20-2007, 07:38 PM
machine machine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Spending Sklansky $ on my girlfriend
Posts: 1,277
Default Re: NL 25 87-line check

na we split the pot, but the consesous is to go broke here right? raise to 10 ish and call a push?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-20-2007, 08:25 PM
crookdimwit crookdimwit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 441
Default Re: NL 25 87-line check

I don't think you did anything wrong, other that maybe over-betting the flop a bit. If villain has a King, that heavy re-raise might convince him he's beat. I'd rather see KQ KJ KT or some call here, and unless he's super loose, he might fold to the $10 raise. I think more often than not, you only get any action here from someone with an 8, which probably has you out-kicked.

But yeah, I think my stack is going in with this hand, sooner or later.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-20-2007, 09:19 PM
AFCBeer AFCBeer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 167
Default Re: NL 25 87-line check

[ QUOTE ]

I disagree with a lot of responses. A raise with that many players on that flop is ominous. Note that we have next to zero hands on villain, and especially lack any evidence that s/he plays draws like this. Most of the time villain has an 8 (nearly always with a better kicker) or a king. Since we want to lose the least to another 8 and keep villain in the hand with a king, hero should play more passively. I suggest calling the flop raise and check-calling most turns. On that particular turn I would check raise.

Preflop, flop, I play it the same.

[/ QUOTE ]

I completely agree. I'm wary of flopping trips actually and I usually treat it as a WA/WB situation. If all the money goes in generally you are only getting called by a better kicker.

Against this villain I would be more prepared to get my chips in given his stats but generally over playing trips is a big mistake that players make.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.