|
|
#11
06-18-2007, 08:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NLTRN: Softness vs. Fees
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If the softness of sites ranges from 1-10 (10 being softest) and a site with 5% fees is 6, how soft would a site with 10% fees have to be (all else being equal) in order to be equally profitable? [/ QUOTE ] It depends. It the player is very fit, he can exploit the softness more fully, if fat and slobby, not so much. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Thatīs pretty funny. Pity we are probably the only ones getting the joke. [/ QUOTE ] Does it have to do with sex? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] 
|
|
#12
06-18-2007, 09:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN: Softness vs. Fees
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If the softness of sites ranges from 1-10 (10 being softest) and a site with 5% fees is 6, how soft would a site with 10% fees have to be (all else being equal) in order to be equally profitable? [/ QUOTE ] It depends. It the player is very fit, he can exploit the softness more fully, if fat and slobby, not so much. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Thatīs pretty funny. Pity we are probably the only ones getting the joke. [/ QUOTE ] Does it have to do with sex? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] No. It is pretty hard to put in words what the joke is about, but it is something like this: I have been discussing the importance of being fit in a thread on Pokertips.org. And like in this thread I wanted to have an accurate answer to a question which no one really knows the answer to. I wanted to know how much the winrate of a super-fit pro would drop to if he became in a simply ok state of fitness given his current hourly rate is $33. I have made several such threads in the past, and jimmytrick is here making fun of the two threads specifically and my such threads in general. Also jimmytrick doesnīt like me, and that somehow makes it a little more funny than otherwise.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
