#91
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
No no, I mean on the graphs.
Not having a disgusting 10 bi downswing should be impossible over, for instance, 200k hands. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
[ QUOTE ]
No no, I mean on the graphs. Not having a disgusting 10 bi downswing should be impossible over, for instance, 200k hands. [/ QUOTE ] well that graph says all 100NL and there are plenty of 10BI downswings there. im assuming its a joke and its probably 200+ but still plenty of -4k downswings over a few k hands |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
[ QUOTE ]
should i give him a new title? suggestions? [/ QUOTE ] You can call him GtrHtr II cause that's what mine looks like too although in about 1/4 the hands. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
I really hate tilt.
|
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
I agree with FE here. I don't think many people can do it but once you are good, I mean REALLY good, you shouldn't need more than a few seconds to make a decision, especially at SSNL. If a player can play 4 tables at 8ptbb/100 and he is good, he should be able to play 8 tables at 8ptbb because he just has to make the decisions quicker which a GOOD player should be able to do.
With that said, I've played 8 tables of nit poker and ran at 4ptbb. I've had to cut down to 4 tables, got bored of nit poker and opened up and am running at 15ptbb (only 5k hands but weeeee). I fully expect to be able to up it to 6 and then 8 when I get good enough. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
[ QUOTE ]
I agree with FE here. I don't think many people can do it but once you are good, I mean REALLY good, you shouldn't need more than a few seconds to make a decision, especially at SSNL. If a player can play 4 tables at 8ptbb/100 and he is good, he should be able to play 8 tables at 8ptbb because he just has to make the decisions quicker which a GOOD player should be able to do. With that said, I've played 8 tables of nit poker and ran at 4ptbb. I've had to cut down to 4 tables, got bored of nit poker and opened up and am running at 15ptbb (only 5k hands but weeeee). I fully expect to be able to up it to 6 and then 8 when I get good enough. [/ QUOTE ] Uhh, how hard is this to get? If you're rushed into any decision, big or small .. you're less likely to make the best play when you have 5 seconds to make a decision before you time out. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Yea, 60 buyin downswings are a bit of a pain, but you get used to it after a while. [/ QUOTE ] How many tables do you average? What are your stats? [/ QUOTE ] 1 table, 40/30, i try and play as LAG as possible. Can only do it by concentrating. [/ QUOTE ] Sorry for question, but if it's all nl 100 and you play 1 table, it sounds like you play 2400 hands in a day with 18.9ptbb?! |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Yea, 60 buyin downswings are a bit of a pain, but you get used to it after a while. [/ QUOTE ] How many tables do you average? What are your stats? [/ QUOTE ] 1 table, 40/30, i try and play as LAG as possible. Can only do it by concentrating. [/ QUOTE ] Sorry for question, but if it's all nl 100 and you play 1 table, it sounds like you play 2400 hands in a day with 18.9ptbb?! [/ QUOTE ] lol yeah, those 24 hour playing days really suck huh? |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
This thread might be semi-informative if it was for 200K+ samples atleast. Anything less is just people bragging about short term variance. I only got 140K hands so seems pointless to post results.
Cant somebody post the results of some datamining at stars/full tilt? And filter for 100K/200K+? Im sure people here have some big databases from datamining services. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
38ptBB/100 at 200nl after 342 hands.
how is this thread still going??? |
|
|