Omaha Poker Coach

[Mucked1st]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

or does my table size matter?

thanks in advance

[/ QUOTE ]
the table must be at normal (not resized) dimension

[tangerine]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

or does my table size matter?

thanks in advance

[/ QUOTE ]
the table must be at normal (not resized) dimension

[/ QUOTE ]

thanks, will try that later

my hand
As Ah Qd 2d

Board
Jh Ts 8c Kc

High Outs = 14

Why it shows 14? I have made my straight, and there is no way i can improve my high

I think 14 outs are for
2 pairs
three J
three T
three 8
three K

3 of a kind
two A

if this is true, should not we set high outs as 0, as now we have no way to improve our high hand?

also, another question....no of player, i should set to number of players still stay in the hand OR the number of players starting the hand?

Thanks in advance

[Mucked1st]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

or does my table size matter?

thanks in advance

[/ QUOTE ]
the table must be at normal (not resized) dimension

[/ QUOTE ]

thanks, will try that later

my hand
As Ah Qd 2d

Board
Jh Ts 8c Kc

High Outs = 14

Why it shows 14? I have made my straight, and there is no way i can improve my high

I think 14 outs are for
2 pairs
three J
three T
three 8
three K

3 of a kind
two A

if this is true, should not we set high outs as 0, as now we have no way to improve our high hand?

also, another question....no of player, i should set to number of players still stay in the hand OR the number of players starting the hand?

Thanks in advance

[/ QUOTE ]

a) we will control it
b) number of players in hand

tx for your feedback

[Mucked1st]

I'm actually at work to implement all things suggested in this Thread
Stay tuned! [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

[tangerine]

questions on hutchinson pts

QsQhJdTc, Hutchinson pts showed 7
A pair of quenns = 5
J kicker =2
T kicker =1
should be 8?

KsKhJdTc, showed 8
a pair of Kings = 6
J kicker = 2
T kicker = 1
should be 9?

i never use the hutchinson system, so im not sure if i have missed anything..i follwed info in
http://www.homestead.com/ehutchison/OmahaSystem.html

KsKhJsTh 0 pts
KsKhJsTd 0 pts
QsQhJsTh 0 pts
QsQhJsTd 0 pts

These qualified as HIGH only for Hutchinson system as mentioned, should we put HIGH instead of O (as user might think 0 means an extremely bad starting hand) ?

Hopefully can see it supports PS full table soon.

Thanks

[Mucked1st]

This is not the correct address of the system, i will give you pm.
There are some errors there.
The Hutchinson method for omaha hi is different from him method for hi-lo.
In Omaha hi - lo the method is that:
In any split pot game the best hands are those that have a chance to win both high and low. Most of the hands without this potential should be discarded. However, there are a few hands that are profitable even though they have no potential to win low.

If you think you can proceed in the hand with hi point then click on "Switch to omaha hi" and consider the hand as an hi hand. Sometimes an opponents with a LO point can make a lot of pressure so consider only high point is not the correct strategy in Hi -lo. Imagine if he is drawing (or have) the "wheel" (A2345) and you reach your set....or 2pair....

[Mucked1st]

added autoread on Pokerstars 9-max table
Bye [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

[tangerine]

pokerstars omaha hi/lo full ring game are all 10-max table.
there are tournaments which are 9-max.

hopefully we could see 10-max to be added as well.

thanks

[Mucked1st]

of course!

[Mucked1st]

Hi,
version 1.14 is out
Updates: autoread on pokerstars 10 max table
Soon other versions with some new features [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]