|
|
#81
06-16-2007, 09:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
The rake is so brutal at these limits. I think it is hard for even the best players to have a sustainable good BB/100. Not sure if this is a valid way to look at rake BB/100, but I looked in the summary tab of PT and looked at the overall BB/100 for all players. To me this would seem to be the amount of $$ the house has taken. Well, using this method I get 3.23 BB/100 at 3/6 and 2.87 BB/100 at 5/10. That's pretty tough to overcome. [/ QUOTE ] between all the bonus and rakeback, i get at least 1.5bb/100 at 5-10 back. so it's not so bad. 
|
|
#82
06-16-2007, 11:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
This is true, and also this is why I stated that I'm not actually concerned with my PT BB/100. I just care about my bottom line and how much $$ I'm taking home with all the benefits. It does suck when I have a month where my PT shows me in the red, but that doesn't mean that I didn't make more money playing poker than I would have if I had a 'real' job.
|
|
#83
06-16-2007, 11:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
This is true, and also this is why I stated that I'm not actually concerned with my PT BB/100. I just care about my bottom line and how much $$ I'm taking home with all the benefits. It does suck when I have a month where my PT shows me in the red, but that doesn't mean that I didn't make more money playing poker than I would have if I had a 'real' job. [/ QUOTE ] I went on a 660BB slide over 50K hands. Between 3-6 and 5-10. Over the three months this happened, I had three winning months with rakeback and bonuses. That's enough to convince me it's worth it to play.
|
|
#84
06-17-2007, 05:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
He said he's rapunzel(sp?) for whoever wanted to know.
... and he runs 17/11/0.93 after 105 hands in my database. :O
|
|
#86
06-17-2007, 12:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
I have a 10k sample on rapunzel and he is nowhere near that tight. Winning in my database too, which is rare.
|
|
#87
06-17-2007, 01:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
So who is JESSMPG?
|
|
#88
06-17-2007, 01:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
Rapunzel41 - gravy legs sucks too. good example of a 36/24 player that is bad.
Joke Right? I like when losing players think winning players are bad. Makes me feel goooood! NH GG USUK
|
|
#89
06-17-2007, 01:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Rapunzel41 - gravy legs sucks too. good example of a 36/24 player that is bad. Joke Right? I like when losing players think winning players are bad. Makes me feel goooood! NH GG USUK [/ QUOTE ] LOL!
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
