#1
|
|||
|
|||
CPA or revenue sharing deal?
Hey guys,
I was just wondering which you prefer: a large upfront commission or revenue sharing? The program I'm looking at specifically pays a $300 CPA or 20% of gross revenues (+25% on $10k+, 30% on $20k+, and 35% on $30k+) I have no experience being an affiliate but my first impression is that the $300 per signup looks like the better choice. (how many people will pay that much in rake or casino losses?) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CPA or revenue sharing deal?
CPA is better only if you KNOW your players won't be playing very much, if they will play for any meaningfull amount of time you will make more from the revenue share. This is ofcourse known by the sites and at least some of the stop paying you the CPA if they notice that your players only play for a very short time each.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CPA or revenue sharing deal?
[ QUOTE ]
This is ofcourse known by the sites and at least some of the stop paying you the CPA if they notice that your players only play for a very short time each. [/ QUOTE ] What sites do you know that do this? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CPA or revenue sharing deal?
Pasific for sure
|
|
|