Is 500 PTBB/100 sustainable? - Page 3

Bavid Denyamine · #21 06-10-2007, 01:18 AM

[x] not even a sample

ocdscale · #22 06-10-2007, 02:02 AM

Lol@ anyone who doesn't think this is sustainable (at 25nl)
Learn to play PLO.

holyfield5 · #23 06-10-2007, 02:05 AM

wtf man ive never even ran that hot for 10 hands

FBP · #24 06-10-2007, 05:19 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Lol@ anyone who doesn't think this is sustainable (at 25nl)
Learn to play PLO.

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT

eurythmech · #25 06-10-2007, 05:42 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Well, there are only 169 possible hands, and seeing as you've played 98.8% of them I'd say it's a pretty good sample size.

[/ QUOTE ]

winnar

Reef · #26 06-10-2007, 06:06 AM

I would've believed 425 bb/100 as sustainable, but 500 is just ridiculous

leturf · #27 06-10-2007, 06:15 AM

someone stake him to play 25c/50c

Louis Vuitton · #28 06-10-2007, 09:18 AM

.................................................. .............................

A+ thread ffs. pure genius

isapistola · #29 06-10-2007, 09:39 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I would've believed 425 bb/100 as sustainable, but 500 is just ridiculous

[/ QUOTE ]
what kind of a moran are you to think 425 would be sustainable? all you kids need a reality check and come back after youve played at least a thousand hands.

FBP · #30 06-10-2007, 10:22 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I would've believed 425 bb/100 as sustainable, but 500 is just ridiculous

[/ QUOTE ]

That's because you don't know all the percentages yet, and then you'll have to learn about substandard variance.
After that sustaining 500BB/100 is a piece of cake.

And ipistola, you obviously are clueless.