If you played 100,000 hands...

[HoneyBadger]

[ QUOTE ]
How did you figure that?

I might fold 75-80% of hand preflop. Then fold 75% of the called had on the flop when the flop misses so right there your down to what like 5%?

[/ QUOTE ]

You also might be too (weak)-tight [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[ QUOTE ]

What difference does this make?/what was the motivation for this question?


[/ QUOTE ]
To check your game. If you're supposed to win 10% and you only won 5% there is something wrong with your game.

(I checked: 9.9% won out of the last 100k hands FR)

[Esso]

I had said 6%-8% but I came up with that number using an "average" % Flops seen and an "average" W$SF. But that's too low because it ignores pots you win while never seeing a flop.

[JaneTheHot]

To check your game. If you're supposed to win 10% and you only won 5% there is something wrong with your game.

(I checked: 9.9% won out of the last 100k hands FR)


thats right, previously when I was winning my % of winning was 10.86 but now its 9.55%

[BigBadBabar]

it doesnt matter if you win 10% of the pots, it just matters than you win 10% (or more) of the money, or in other words, that you're profitable.

plenty of lags win 15% of pots or more but lose money because they lose to tags in all the big pots.

[JaneTheHot]

I was just considering if you are a tight player that plays about 20% of the hands.

[Befolder]

This analysis is ridiculous, pointless and very basic. This is what my brother used to say to me while looking at his stats on Pokerroom while playing.

5% doesn't necessarily mean your game is wrong. You could be running bad.

[HoneyBadger]

I dare say that if you win only 5% in 100k (!) hands there is a problem with your game.

[Befolder]

Well for 100K hands. Ummm yeah, that would be one hell of a run of bad cards for there not to be major flaws.

My point is, who of you actually analyzes your failure or success at this game by that measure? I'd say none since there are so many other better measurements.

[HoneyBadger]

Oh, that way. Of course there's better measures; I thought it was mainly a theoretical question.

[Befolder]

It seem to be a bit, but feels like it belongs in the NC thread because it really doesn't add anything. I'm probably just being a b*tch.