Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-01-2007, 12:43 PM
Nate tha\\\' Great Nate tha\\\' Great is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: blogging
Posts: 8,480
Default Illinois gambling plan passes Senate; now needs to pass House

Don't get too excited since the House majority leader is not a fan of the proposal and probably will not round up his constituents.

We're just one step away, though, since the governor will sign the bill if the House passes it.

http://www.wqad.com/Global/story.asp...7&nav=1sW7
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-01-2007, 01:22 PM
MiltonFriedman MiltonFriedman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waaay down below
Posts: 1,627
Default I would now say the measure looks good because ...

... Madigan, in the House is quoted as follows:

"House Speaker Michael Madigan says House Democrats might be willing to support a much smaller expansion that would apply only to existing casinos."

It is a classic NIMBY reaction, one which does not rule out existing horse tracks from adding online gambling. (NIMBY = Not In My Back Yard.)

Can someone get a copy of the actual bill passed by the House, to see if the online stuff is still in it ?

This is a pleasant surprise, especially IF it passes before the Federal regs are out.

Milton
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-01-2007, 01:32 PM
mshalen mshalen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Moving to Chicago
Posts: 881
Default Re: I would now say the measure looks good because ...

http://www.nbc5.com/news/13426649/detail.html

"The measure also offers money to help support the horse-racing industry and would allow electronic poker at casinos so that people could play against gamblers across the country"

I am going to repeat my theory that they are throwing a bone to the tracks so they will support the bill, but they don't understand the ramifications of what they are doing.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-01-2007, 01:36 PM
MiltonFriedman MiltonFriedman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waaay down below
Posts: 1,627
Default Great, but we still need to see the actual language

"The measure also offers money to help support the horse-racing industry and would allow electronic poker at casinos so that people could play against gamblers across the country.'

OOPS, the "across the country" part is worrisome. I would have preferred to see "babysteps".

I'll try and get a copy from someone.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-01-2007, 01:40 PM
MiltonFriedman MiltonFriedman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waaay down below
Posts: 1,627
Default Dems in Illinois have the votes to pass it without any Republican vote

The illinois Senate Democrats have the votes to pass it without any Republican votes, and a Democrat Governor who is backing it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-01-2007, 02:33 PM
Lucky Lucky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,694
Default Re: Dems in Illinois have the votes to pass it without any Republican vote

[ QUOTE ]
The illinois Senate Democrats have the votes to pass it without any Republican votes, and a Democrat Governor who is backing it.

[/ QUOTE ]

This sounds like terrific news. With respect to opening poker based at racetracks to 'gamblers from around the country' would this include Wisconsin? Or would states have to opt in, and because Wisconsin has thus far been considered one of the banned states, i'd have to move to north illi-noise.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.