|
|
#11
05-31-2007, 04:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mike Vick Prop (Bodog)
Blank held on to Nardelli for 6 years (about 5.5 years too long) and that prick spent $1BB of Home Depot's money and couldn't get their stock moving. So, I'm confident he'll hang on to Vick as well.
|
|
#12
05-31-2007, 04:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mike Vick Prop (Bodog)
[ QUOTE ]
I could be totally wrong, but I thought -250 was good, even with the long duration. I wouldn't tie a large percentage of my roll up in it, but for a small bet I think there's value. [/ QUOTE ]I have no problem with prop bets that are a year long and I have taken many. The key is that the bet must have a large expected return and that you don't tie up too much of your roll. If you believe the value is there then it is a good bet.
|
|
#13
05-31-2007, 05:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mike Vick Prop (Bodog)
[ QUOTE ]
Blank held on to Nardelli for 6 years (about 5.5 years too long) and that prick spent $1BB of Home Depot's money and couldn't get their stock moving. So, I'm confident he'll hang on to Vick as well. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, Nardelli only doubled revenues and lifted earnings 150% in 6 years. He stunk, right? Don't opine on industries you're not expert on. Besides, no one at 2p2 cares anyway [wrt you or me.]
|
|
#14
05-31-2007, 06:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mike Vick Prop (Bodog)
Not that we should start weighing the relative degrees of wrongdoing for anyone accused of a felony, but what Pacman Jones is accused of is probably much worse and the Titans probably won't cut him. It's just the nature of the business.
|
|
#15
05-31-2007, 07:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mike Vick Prop (Bodog)
Yeah, Nardelli only doubled revenues and lifted earnings 150% in 6 years. He stunk, right?
Don't opine on industries you're not expert on. Besides, no one at 2p2 cares anyway [wrt you or me.] [/ QUOTE ] Investors don't care about top-line revenue. They care about price. And quit acting like you own this place.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
