Why doesn't Ongame have higher stakes short handed NL tables?

[bate_nasko]

Title says it all... Highest short handed hold'em NL tables I believe on Ongame are 2/4NL. Any reason for that other than they don't want people to lose their money too quickly in order to get a bigger chunk as rake? Full ring is an entirely different game and I don't want ot play that crap...

Also, what was the email address of the person who was adressing ongame issues on 2p2? obudsman@ongame.com ? have no idea

bate_nasko

[OngameClassic]

Hi bate_nasko,

After having made some inquiries, we have been informed that higher limit tables will be introduced across a range of games and variations within the near future upon request from our contracted partners.

Thanks for bringing it up though as every request from our operators or their players helps us improve the Ongame Network offering.

Looking forward to being able to welcome you all to our new, soon to be released home!

Sincerely,

The Ombudsman
Ongame Network
ombudsman@ongamenetwork.com

[Dr_Chris]

Or you can start your own tables, there aren’t any low stakes (<50c) SH tables or 6 max either but plenty of “private” ones are running all the time.

Chris

[bate_nasko]

Hi,

Thank you for the quick reply! It is certainly a nice surprise to see your presence here. I hope the issue gets resolved soon. Short handed NL hold'em seems to be by far the most popular game on your network. Why not offer the full range of levels that all other major sites/networks do?This can only turn away customers, no?

Again, thanks for the quick response.

bate_nasko

[pokerplayer1]

I don't understand what you're problem is bate? We have short handed tables all the way up to the $5kNL