NL10 playing against an ultra tight villan

[joxstrap]

The villan in was ultra tight/passive. His stats were 10/3/.75 over about 150 hands.

Initially I was raising to steal the blinds, as I was doing most rounds because he was immediately to my left, and was so incredibly tight. He was folding to probably 95% of my steal attempts.

When he played back at me I knew he had big cards, and called hoping to flop a monster and stack him. I'm wondering, was this call too loose, even with the button and the above info? I know I can easily fold, knowing I have the worst hand, but the chance to double through him was there somewhat I suppose.

Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

MP ($10.05)
CO ($6.80)
Hero ($8.25)
SB ($29.05)
BB ($4.50)
UTG ($2.20)

Preflop: Hero is Button with K, 3.
3 folds, Hero raises to $0.3, SB raises to $1.05, 1 fold, Hero calls $0.70.

Flop: ($2.15) A, K, K (2 players)
SB bets $1, Hero raises to $3.5</font>, SB calls $2.50.

Turn: ($9.15) 7 (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $3.75 (All-In), SB calls $3.75.

River: ($16.65) 8 (2 players, 1 all-in)</font>

Final Pot: $16.65

Thoughts?

[creamfillin]

If he's that tight than you want to control the size of pot, only better kings are calling your raises from this villain. I'm thinking cheap showdown here.

[T-Bone98]

If he is as tight as u say I would fold preflop after he plays back at me. But that also depends on how he has reacted to "blindstealing" before.

[creamfillin]

I didn't even see the PF 3B from villain, 100% fold this trash after he 3-bets you

[Landonfan]

Fold preflop.

The rest is fine. You're not calling for implied odds just to get a cheap showdown when you hit. You may be beat, or villian may just be tired of getting run over and decided to stack off no matter what.