![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone pay attention to these? It seems all ICM calcs focus on BB/stack ratio rather than M.
M values as advocated in HoH seem to encourage loose pushes in ICM terms. Is this right or is it just that M is more for MTTs? I can't see any difference between a STT and FT of a MTT in terms of analysing usefulness of M. Also, Q is virtually useless in STTs right? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unread the HOH books!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I can't see any difference between a STT and FT of a MTT in terms of analysing usefulness of M. [/ QUOTE ] Applications of M in STTs differ from those in MTT FTs bc of the drastic differences in payout structures. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
O GOD!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Unread the HOH books! [/ QUOTE ] I found the HOH books helpful for MTT but some of his STT advice looks a little loose early. Should I just disregard his STT advice? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
disregard the whole book IMO this forum>>>>HOH
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even the MTT stuff??!!
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Even the MTT stuff??!! [/ QUOTE ] No, there's some useful stuff, especially starting out, but there is definitely some room for polishing and you shouldn't take it as gospel. |
![]() |
|
|