Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-28-2007, 08:24 AM
Niediam Niediam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,269
Default Re: PF decisions vs robotically tight opponents

[ QUOTE ]
why.

[/ QUOTE ]


What range do you put somebody who raies 1.5% of the time on? Pokerstove says the top 1.5% of hands is QQ+. Even if we add AK to the mix we still only have a 36% equity against his range.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-28-2007, 08:26 AM
nerdking nerdking is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fishmax ironman
Posts: 1,145
Default Re: PF decisions vs robotically tight opponents

1.) monster hand, multiway pot, position

2.) monster hand, position

3.) slightly less than monster hand POSITION

4.) marginal hand, tight opponent leads, I'll grudgingly fold, although if I had more people in the pot i'd play

5.) 88 I play for set value, which I'm not getting

6.) KJos we're behind more than we're ahead

it's certainly a good thing that holdem isn't played with just two cards or else I'd be screwed. We're giving up wayyyyy to much value folding these hands, our investment of 1-2 SB here and there gets us so many more BB over the long run depending how the hand plays out. C'mon guys...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-28-2007, 09:42 AM
kerowo kerowo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,880
Default Re: PF decisions vs robotically tight opponents

If you are only going to play hands that those guys aren't in you should be switching tables.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-28-2007, 09:56 AM
Ampelmann Ampelmann is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: lol donkaments
Posts: 1,652
Default Re: PF decisions vs robotically tight opponents

[ QUOTE ]
If you are only going to play hands that those guys aren't in you should be switching tables.

[/ QUOTE ]
If there are only 1 or 2 of those at a FR table, you're not going to be involved in many hands with them.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-28-2007, 12:49 PM
DavidC DavidC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: omfg
Posts: 9,677
Default Re: PF decisions vs robotically tight opponents

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you are only going to play hands that those guys aren't in you should be switching tables.

[/ QUOTE ]
If there are only 1 or 2 of those at a FR table, you're not going to be involved in many hands with them.

[/ QUOTE ]

Plus you can still play when they limp, or when they raise and you have QQ+, and maybe AK, or the pot is developing favourably (AQs hand, for example).

to NK: position is more important in NL than limit... not saying it's not important, though.

Now I've put out my answers as best I can so far... but they're not gospel truth or anything like that, so if a few more people add their answers to this we can hash out where there's disagreement.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-28-2007, 02:23 PM
nerdking nerdking is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fishmax ironman
Posts: 1,145
Default Re: PF decisions vs robotically tight opponents

I mention position because it looks like these guys are awful postflop. If we're acting after them then we have an advantage. Weak-tight is not the answer, guys...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-28-2007, 02:39 PM
reutel reutel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 210
Default Re: PF decisions vs robotically tight opponents

I think its even better to call with non-dominated hands that with AQs, which is getting CRUSHED versus their range. Folding for the win! These nits are paying their blinds, like everybody else and that is where you get them
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-28-2007, 06:00 PM
Douglas Leslie Douglas Leslie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 192
Default Re: PF decisions vs robotically tight opponents

225 minus is far too small a sample size to be folding hands like 1010, AQs and AKo against this kind of betting. In fact I wouldn't be folding them regardless of pre-flop raise stats unless I had positive reads to the effect that these guys would limp hands like AK, KQ, AJ, AQ, etc. I am really surprised that so many people are prepared to throw away these hands on the basis of such tenuous "reads".
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.