#1
|
|||
|
|||
looking at a regulars really werid position numbers
button vpip is 8.11, but utg is 20.9. seem real odd to anyone else, i know its only over 1200 hands, but still. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking at a regulars really werid position numbers
Sample size is meaningless for this.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking at a regulars really werid position numbers
sample size is kind of small for figuring this out, but generally speaking this regular must suck pretty bad!!! his button/co/mp3 vpip and pfr stats are pretty bad even for 1200 hundred hands...hmmm maybe this isnt a small sample size after all this guy might actually suck this bad......
WAIT THIS IS NOT ME IS IT [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking at a regulars really werid position numbers
tolushev?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking at a regulars really werid position numbers
[ QUOTE ]
tolushev? [/ QUOTE ] hahah |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking at a regulars really werid position numbers
Add a filter to only look at hands where the table is full. Things still might be weird, but with the much lower number of hands at position 6, I think that indicates that they play more hands at short-handed tables. Plus their win rate could also imply that they've been getting dealt some pretty good hands UTG, so sample size definitely comes into play as well.
jb |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking at a regulars really werid position numbers
Two things.
(1) Sample size is tiny. He might have just gotten a good run of cards in EP. (2) Looks like a positionally-unaware player who has read a primer on starting hands. He is "playing" ~20% of hands, but only calling raises with 15% of hands, and since there's more opportunity to have it raised before him in late position, he's playing fewer pots. In other words, UTG he's first in and playing his full range, but OTB most of the time someone has a hand or is stealing the blinds so he's only playing premium hands thus the lower VPIP. To me it looks like a bad script - limp with XYZ, raise with XY, but only call a raise with X - that is not positionally aware. Or just a weird sample. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking at a regulars really werid position numbers
Raistlinx likes to play more hands OOP because Gus Hansen wrote an article saying it was okay.
Maybe this is him? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking at a regulars really werid position numbers
that is very odd
here is a more typical one FWIW, my numbers are very different from that now as I learned many things. This is my 400k hands ago philosophy |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking at a regulars really werid position numbers
when it comes to position stats, 1000 hands is VERY small sample. give me 10k hands and I might think this guy is playing backwards
|
|
|