Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-24-2007, 07:45 PM
cts cts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 5,208
Default Re: standard or really terrible?

lol, I def don't love it I just don't think it's "really terrible." I'm a lot more cautious/passive in limped pots than most of yall.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-24-2007, 07:47 PM
king_of_drafts king_of_drafts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: studying
Posts: 2,661
Default Re: standard or really terrible?

[ QUOTE ]
you and bakes must talk on IM?

"I HAS A DRAW. I IS ALL IN"

[/ QUOTE ]

no, lol...believe it or not I am one of those "thinking-aggressive type players." This is further evidenced by my thoughtful, deceptive preflop check with a powerful holding, the king and queen of offsuit

I thought there was a good chance both idiots would get involved...I don't think it's bad smooth calling or raising but if I commit myself now I get to see TWO cards, guaranteed (!). I got the cts seal of semiapproval, so that must count for something
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-24-2007, 07:50 PM
RiverHebrew2 RiverHebrew2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,293
Default Re: standard or really terrible?

This is ok u have gutshot+NFD, with lots of FE. I gamble here and reraise I like it.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-24-2007, 07:51 PM
king_of_drafts king_of_drafts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: studying
Posts: 2,661
Default Re: standard or really terrible?

wtf, meant to edit, not doublepost
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-24-2007, 07:53 PM
king_of_drafts king_of_drafts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: studying
Posts: 2,661
Default Re: standard or really terrible?

[ QUOTE ]
lol, I def don't love it I just don't think it's "really terrible." I'm a lot more cautious/passive in limped pots than most of yall.

[/ QUOTE ]

yea that's why I said semiapproval.

I think that's actually a really good policy to be more passive btw, I just need to start implementing it or something
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-24-2007, 07:57 PM
Big_Jim Big_Jim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BEHIND YOU
Posts: 12,323
Default Re: standard or really terrible?

[ QUOTE ]
lots of FE

[/ QUOTE ]
o rly?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-24-2007, 08:39 PM
rand rand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 1,021
Default Re: standard or really terrible?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
lots of FE

[/ QUOTE ]
o rly?

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT
CTS also...
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-24-2007, 09:19 PM
Parlay Slow Parlay Slow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Proud to be Polish!
Posts: 3,869
Default Re: standard or really terrible?

[ QUOTE ]
lol, I def don't love it I just don't think it's "really terrible." I'm a lot more cautious/passive in limped pots than most of yall.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd actually say most 2+2ers in general are total rag dolls in limped pots.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-24-2007, 10:17 PM
cts cts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 5,208
Default Re: standard or really terrible?

how do rag dolls play? im confused
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-24-2007, 10:59 PM
rilleg rilleg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 40
Default Re: standard or really terrible?

i dont like the "raise", i am shoving that flop in my normal game..but its a weird spot depending mood. if you are up alot and dont feel like risking too much fold, if you are stuck you gamble and if in a "normal" way you just shove
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.